Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Clint_L" data-source="post: 9137398" data-attributes="member: 7035894">No. Your claim was "The type of fighter the majority of the 5e community wants doesn't exist in 5E. It will require an additional 1 to 4 new classes."You have provided ZERO evidence in support of your assertion, and your interpretation of the limited data that you have focused on is nonsensical. There is NO data from WotC showing that "The type of fighter the majority of the 5e community wants doesn't exist in 5E," let alone the bit about additional classes. I don't even think that is a meaningful statement - your terms are completely undefined. What is the "5e community" and how are you measuring "the type of fighter" they want? You keep pulling out random numbers from various tests, none of which suggest anything like what you are asserting, and then make blanket statements.You are simply asserting your beliefs as facts about the world, and cherry picking whatever evidence suits you to be reinterpreted as support for your beliefs.If you want to argue about your opinions, argue about your opinions. Stop presenting them as made up "facts." Make a compelling case.</blockquote>