Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Crab Bucket Fallacy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 9137431" data-attributes="member: 6704184"><p><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🙄" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" title="Face with rolling eyes :rolling_eyes:" data-shortname=":rolling_eyes:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /></p><p></p><p>So either don’t drop combat, or base it on a different class. 3/1/3 is within the scale of the classes in the PHB. It’s fine. It does not matter if it’s “better” (for some tables” than the PHB fighter.</p><p></p><p>In order, paladin, paladin, Barbarian or Monk, perfectly doable with the fighter chassis as is.</p><p></p><p>That’s a reductive way to look at it, that doesn’t reflect how subclasses and classes are designed in 5e. Combat balance is based on spells, using the DMG spell damage by level chart, more or less.</p><p></p><p>If the fighter is underpowered out of combat, this is irrelevant. You don’t design toward underpowered examples, you just within the PHB power scale of all classes. Why on earth would you give a damn if it’s better than a class you consider underpowered?</p><p></p><p>No, that’s your hang up.</p><p></p><p>Like, did you notice that they didn’t take anything away from the fighter, while giving it more second wind and more to use it on, as well as other new features?</p><p></p><p>Like taking the archer/sharpshooter class idea. I would <em>never base it on the 2014 fighter</em> unless I was going to just literally make it a variant fighter to leverage those class features. I do think a variant fighter wouldn't need much adjustment, though, especially from the 2024 fighter if it's pretty close to playtest 7. </p><p></p><p>IF I want an archer from the ground up, I'm looking at the Monk, Rogue, and Ranger, for inspiration, and probably using the Monk as the chassis.</p><p></p><p> I always combine ki and the martial arts die when I use the monk as a chassis for a new class, so the Archer would have Focus Dice, and would have a dynamic of at-will features that can be pushed harder using focus dice. </p><p></p><p>Perfect Aim: add an amount equal to their focus die plus their wisdom to the damage of a ranged weapon attack as a bonus action, at-will. Spend a focus die to increase that damage, either an additional die or some other boost.</p><p></p><p>Nimble Shooter: use some of their movement any time they use a reaction, spend a die to gain extra movement of some kind</p><p></p><p>etc add in the ability to shoot projectiles out of the air, spend a bonus action and a die to gain advantage on ranged weapon attacks within normal range and ignore long range, whatever else, regain a focus die when you crit maybe x/long rest</p><p></p><p>evasion and uncanny dodge, bard level expertise or at least more skills than the monk gets.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 9137431, member: 6704184"] 🙄 So either don’t drop combat, or base it on a different class. 3/1/3 is within the scale of the classes in the PHB. It’s fine. It does not matter if it’s “better” (for some tables” than the PHB fighter. In order, paladin, paladin, Barbarian or Monk, perfectly doable with the fighter chassis as is. That’s a reductive way to look at it, that doesn’t reflect how subclasses and classes are designed in 5e. Combat balance is based on spells, using the DMG spell damage by level chart, more or less. If the fighter is underpowered out of combat, this is irrelevant. You don’t design toward underpowered examples, you just within the PHB power scale of all classes. Why on earth would you give a damn if it’s better than a class you consider underpowered? No, that’s your hang up. Like, did you notice that they didn’t take anything away from the fighter, while giving it more second wind and more to use it on, as well as other new features? Like taking the archer/sharpshooter class idea. I would [I]never base it on the 2014 fighter[/I] unless I was going to just literally make it a variant fighter to leverage those class features. I do think a variant fighter wouldn't need much adjustment, though, especially from the 2024 fighter if it's pretty close to playtest 7. IF I want an archer from the ground up, I'm looking at the Monk, Rogue, and Ranger, for inspiration, and probably using the Monk as the chassis. I always combine ki and the martial arts die when I use the monk as a chassis for a new class, so the Archer would have Focus Dice, and would have a dynamic of at-will features that can be pushed harder using focus dice. Perfect Aim: add an amount equal to their focus die plus their wisdom to the damage of a ranged weapon attack as a bonus action, at-will. Spend a focus die to increase that damage, either an additional die or some other boost. Nimble Shooter: use some of their movement any time they use a reaction, spend a die to gain extra movement of some kind etc add in the ability to shoot projectiles out of the air, spend a bonus action and a die to gain advantage on ranged weapon attacks within normal range and ignore long range, whatever else, regain a focus die when you crit maybe x/long rest evasion and uncanny dodge, bard level expertise or at least more skills than the monk gets. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Crab Bucket Fallacy
Top