Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Crab Bucket Fallacy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cap'n Kobold" data-source="post: 9137970" data-attributes="member: 6802951"><p>All PCs can contribute. All have ability scores, 4 proficiencies, a background feature and a player with a working brain. </p><p>All classes have additional features that allow them to contribute outside of combat. </p><p>The suggestion is to give the fighter class options to bring their non-combat options closer to those of other classes.</p><p></p><p>The fighter is still having to roll for it. The bard might have the option to teleport or phase their way out, Shatter the door to smash it, Animate it to open, Polymorph themselves into something with a better strength etc. etc.</p><p>Even if they don't happen to have a spell that could be leveraged in that situation, they still have better ability checks than the fighter does. Therefore even if they have a lower bonus for this check in this very specific situation leveraging the fighter's primary ability score, they have a decent chance at other options like diving out the window and landing safely with Acrobatics.</p><p></p><p>This is the heart of the issue: Much can be achieved with just creativity, a hammer, and a complete disregard for the Laws of God and Man.</p><p>Much more can be achieved with creativity, a hammer, and a toolkit full of more specialised tools. They can not only do things that no amount of creativity would allow the hammer to achieve, they can also be used with creativity to achieve much more.</p><p>And, at the end of the day, if you cannot use any of those more specialised tools, because you don't have the right ones, or you already used them, or you're saving them for something else . . . </p><p><em>You still have that hammer.</em></p><p></p><p></p><p>The issue there is that unless the DM lays a fairly heavy thumb on the scales, the Bard's background is going to be the one that is useful an equal amount of times as the Fighter's. And there will be a fair amount of the time when neither can be applied and a check is called for, which is where the the bard having a much greater total of their modifiers to ability checks will mean that they will generally be better at those. Plus options like disguise or alter self to look like people the guard would be willing to parley with, detect thoughts to give an idea of what approach would go well, suggestion spell etc if the bard has them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cap'n Kobold, post: 9137970, member: 6802951"] All PCs can contribute. All have ability scores, 4 proficiencies, a background feature and a player with a working brain. All classes have additional features that allow them to contribute outside of combat. The suggestion is to give the fighter class options to bring their non-combat options closer to those of other classes. The fighter is still having to roll for it. The bard might have the option to teleport or phase their way out, Shatter the door to smash it, Animate it to open, Polymorph themselves into something with a better strength etc. etc. Even if they don't happen to have a spell that could be leveraged in that situation, they still have better ability checks than the fighter does. Therefore even if they have a lower bonus for this check in this very specific situation leveraging the fighter's primary ability score, they have a decent chance at other options like diving out the window and landing safely with Acrobatics. This is the heart of the issue: Much can be achieved with just creativity, a hammer, and a complete disregard for the Laws of God and Man. Much more can be achieved with creativity, a hammer, and a toolkit full of more specialised tools. They can not only do things that no amount of creativity would allow the hammer to achieve, they can also be used with creativity to achieve much more. And, at the end of the day, if you cannot use any of those more specialised tools, because you don't have the right ones, or you already used them, or you're saving them for something else . . . [I]You still have that hammer.[/I] The issue there is that unless the DM lays a fairly heavy thumb on the scales, the Bard's background is going to be the one that is useful an equal amount of times as the Fighter's. And there will be a fair amount of the time when neither can be applied and a check is called for, which is where the the bard having a much greater total of their modifiers to ability checks will mean that they will generally be better at those. Plus options like disguise or alter self to look like people the guard would be willing to parley with, detect thoughts to give an idea of what approach would go well, suggestion spell etc if the bard has them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Crab Bucket Fallacy
Top