Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Crab Bucket Fallacy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 9140468" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>I will quote the answer you were replying to again and add extra emphasis.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px">LOLNope.<strong> <em>If it can not shout at someone on 0hp and provide them with enough energy to stand back up it isn't remotely comparable to a 4e warlord.</em></strong> End of story. It can't do the single most important part of the job of a warlord.</p><p></p><p>This was something literally every single warlord in 4e could do at first level. By moving to temp hit points the 5e warlord's Rally is not fit for purpose. And complaining that there were a lot of options in 4e in no sense makes up for the fact that this was a <em>first level ability shared by literally all warlords.</em></p><p></p><p>So what you're saying is that 5e martials are so half-assed that none of them should be allowed to do the single class defining feature literally all warlords in 4e could do <em>from first level.</em></p><p></p><p><em>Almost all </em>warlords did more damage by attacking with allies. For that matter so does the Battlemaster.</p><p></p><p>A <em>Lazylord</em> was very specifically a warlord who had no significant ability to attack themselves and who had to give all their attacks away because they had no other choice. They got no actual mechanical benefit for this other than being able to dump strength.</p><p></p><p>You can say that the Conjuration school is a powerful school of magic if you like just as you can say that giving away attacks is powerful. But a <em>Lazylord</em> is the equivalent of a wizard who restricts themselves to <em>only</em> the conjuration school and doesn't take a single spell from outside that school. They are inevitably going to be weaker than a conjuration specialist who takes the majority of their spells from Conjuration but also has a smattering from other schools. </p><p></p><p>So why was the Lazylord such a big meme in 4e? Because they allowed you to play characters that you could play no other way and in no other edition of D&D if you wanted to be part of the team. They enabled you to play a character with no personal martial skill and no magical talents who nevertheless actually contributed their share rather than were just part of an escort mission. For example a princess being escorted might be a lazylord. Played by a player and given a full personality - but the player doesn't have to sit out the combats. Instead they can scream for help, point things out, yell duck, and organise things and not as a player be consigned to boredom and to the knowledge that as a player they aren't doing their part.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 9140468, member: 87792"] I will quote the answer you were replying to again and add extra emphasis. [INDENT]LOLNope.[B] [I]If it can not shout at someone on 0hp and provide them with enough energy to stand back up it isn't remotely comparable to a 4e warlord.[/I][/B] End of story. It can't do the single most important part of the job of a warlord.[/INDENT] This was something literally every single warlord in 4e could do at first level. By moving to temp hit points the 5e warlord's Rally is not fit for purpose. And complaining that there were a lot of options in 4e in no sense makes up for the fact that this was a [I]first level ability shared by literally all warlords.[/I] So what you're saying is that 5e martials are so half-assed that none of them should be allowed to do the single class defining feature literally all warlords in 4e could do [I]from first level.[/I] [I]Almost all [/I]warlords did more damage by attacking with allies. For that matter so does the Battlemaster. A [I]Lazylord[/I] was very specifically a warlord who had no significant ability to attack themselves and who had to give all their attacks away because they had no other choice. They got no actual mechanical benefit for this other than being able to dump strength. You can say that the Conjuration school is a powerful school of magic if you like just as you can say that giving away attacks is powerful. But a [I]Lazylord[/I] is the equivalent of a wizard who restricts themselves to [I]only[/I] the conjuration school and doesn't take a single spell from outside that school. They are inevitably going to be weaker than a conjuration specialist who takes the majority of their spells from Conjuration but also has a smattering from other schools. So why was the Lazylord such a big meme in 4e? Because they allowed you to play characters that you could play no other way and in no other edition of D&D if you wanted to be part of the team. They enabled you to play a character with no personal martial skill and no magical talents who nevertheless actually contributed their share rather than were just part of an escort mission. For example a princess being escorted might be a lazylord. Played by a player and given a full personality - but the player doesn't have to sit out the combats. Instead they can scream for help, point things out, yell duck, and organise things and not as a player be consigned to boredom and to the knowledge that as a player they aren't doing their part. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Crab Bucket Fallacy
Top