Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Oofta" data-source="post: 9148023" data-attributes="member: 6801845">They did UA articles for new classes and received negative feedback.  So yes, a lot of people that play the game believe it would be bad for the game.If by "more love" you mean "significant changes", then I'd say it's a risk not worth taking.  Fighters are the most popular class, followed by rogues.  A lot of people like playing them because of the simplicity.Then it's a good thing that all classes can be decent at social encounters if that's what a player wants.  A lot of people don't care and, although I know nobody reads it, the DMG encourages the DM to ensure that everyone participates on a regular basis and gives examples of how to do it.That would change the nature of the game.  See my comment above, fighters and rogues are the most popular classes without it.We have people saying they're already supernaturally capable because they can fight dragons and win.  But there's a big gap between a show like The Witcher where Geralt fights wyverns and anime where someone smacks the ground with a hammer and it causes a fissure to open.  I accept that all PCs in D&D are action movie heroes, I don't want anime caricatures.  Based on feedback from surveys, neither do most people.</blockquote>