Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The current state of fantasy literature
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mouseferatu" data-source="post: 1343320" data-attributes="member: 1288"><p>D'oh!! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":o" title="Eek! :o" data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":o" /> </p><p></p><p>Yep, I certainly did.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Right, but I'm not sure we've got the chicken and the egg in the right order. Do stand-alones not sell as well because people prefer series, or do people buy more series because there are more series than standalones out there in modern fantasy?</p><p></p><p>Let me clarify:</p><p></p><p>I have no doubt that, at one point back when the numbers were roughly equal, people were no doubt buying series more than standalones. But I'd hazard a guess that it's <em>not</em> because a majority of the fans prefer epic series to individual books. Look at in terms of numbers (and I'm pulling numbers out of a hat to illustrate something; one again, I don't claim these are statistics).</p><p></p><p>Let's say that, on average, 1 out of every 10 stories published in fantasy becomes popular. If a story is five books long, it will sell more books than a story that's one book long, because people who like the story want to finish it. It's not that they "prefer" a series; it's that they have to buy more books to finish the story, so the sales indicate that series are more profitable.</p><p></p><p>In other words, one could argue that series sell better because they <em>force</em> fans to buy more books to get the whole story, rather than because people <em>inherently</em> prefer them.</p><p></p><p>Publishers realize this, and begin pushing writers to write series, rather than standalones. If a series fails on the first book, the publisher need not continue it, and has lost nothing more than the cost of a single book. Should it succeed, the publisher/writer keep adding to it, and making more off it. Under this model, you're correct that it makes financial sense for publishers to prefer series--but that's <em>not</em> because it's what the majority of the market truly wants.</p><p></p><p>I don't think series are evil. The vast majority of my favorite fantasy novels are series--but then, I can't think of very many standalone fantasy novels I even <em>own</em> anymore. I'd just like, as a consumer, to have the option of one or the other, and I feel that option has been largely taken away from me in the past decade or so.</p><p></p><p>(And we won't even talk about what this situation does to those of us who are trying to get novels <em>published</em>.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mouseferatu, post: 1343320, member: 1288"] D'oh!! :o Yep, I certainly did. Right, but I'm not sure we've got the chicken and the egg in the right order. Do stand-alones not sell as well because people prefer series, or do people buy more series because there are more series than standalones out there in modern fantasy? Let me clarify: I have no doubt that, at one point back when the numbers were roughly equal, people were no doubt buying series more than standalones. But I'd hazard a guess that it's [i]not[/i] because a majority of the fans prefer epic series to individual books. Look at in terms of numbers (and I'm pulling numbers out of a hat to illustrate something; one again, I don't claim these are statistics). Let's say that, on average, 1 out of every 10 stories published in fantasy becomes popular. If a story is five books long, it will sell more books than a story that's one book long, because people who like the story want to finish it. It's not that they "prefer" a series; it's that they have to buy more books to finish the story, so the sales indicate that series are more profitable. In other words, one could argue that series sell better because they [i]force[/i] fans to buy more books to get the whole story, rather than because people [i]inherently[/i] prefer them. Publishers realize this, and begin pushing writers to write series, rather than standalones. If a series fails on the first book, the publisher need not continue it, and has lost nothing more than the cost of a single book. Should it succeed, the publisher/writer keep adding to it, and making more off it. Under this model, you're correct that it makes financial sense for publishers to prefer series--but that's [i]not[/i] because it's what the majority of the market truly wants. I don't think series are evil. The vast majority of my favorite fantasy novels are series--but then, I can't think of very many standalone fantasy novels I even [i]own[/i] anymore. I'd just like, as a consumer, to have the option of one or the other, and I feel that option has been largely taken away from me in the past decade or so. (And we won't even talk about what this situation does to those of us who are trying to get novels [i]published[/i].) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The current state of fantasy literature
Top