Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Echohawk" data-source="post: 9565815" data-attributes="member: 9849">I know you said this wasn't aimed at me, but I believe that your claim is, in fact, provable as false.When 4e launched, WotC made PDFs of the books available through DriveThruRPG. However, these were delayed by one month. The physical PHB released on 6 June 2008 and the PDF on 9 July. Since D&amp;D Insider only launched in October of 2008, the total digital sales in the first month of 4e were exactly zero.When 5e launched, D&amp;D Beyond did not exist (it launched in 2017), therefore the total digital sales in the first month of 5e were also exactly zero.Since 5e and 4e had identical digital sales in their first months, it cannot be said that 5e had worse digital sales, and your claim does not stand. Sorry! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool&nbsp; &nbsp; :cool:"&nbsp; data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Echohawk, post: 9565815, member: 9849"] I know you said this wasn't aimed at me, but I believe that your claim is, in fact, provable as [B]false[/B]. When 4e launched, WotC made PDFs of the books available through DriveThruRPG. However, these were delayed by one month. The physical PHB released on 6 June 2008 and the PDF on 9 July. Since D&D Insider only launched in October of 2008, the total digital sales in the first month of 4e were exactly zero. When 5e launched, D&D Beyond did not exist (it launched in 2017), therefore the total digital sales in the first month of 5e were also exactly zero. Since 5e and 4e had identical digital sales in their first months, it cannot be said that 5e had [I]worse[/I] digital sales, and your claim does not stand. Sorry! :cool: [/QUOTE]

Verification