Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Promotions/Press
The D&D 4th edition Rennaissaince: A look into the history of the edition, its flaws and its merits
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Joshua Randall" data-source="post: 9569511" data-attributes="member: 7737"><p>Are you for real right now? OK let's do this.</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Post #1: the drive-by of the blog article.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Post #2: me, complaining about its inaccuracies, including release dates of 4e relative to Pathfinder (the game system).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Post #3: Alzrius debates my Pathfinder dates. This continues for a while.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Post #15: Tigris mentions that sales of 4e --> Essentials may have dropped more than 3e --> 3.5. However he mentioned it in a neutral way and it's relatively noncontroversial. He very importantly does NOT say "and you are a fool if you like 4e because it sold poorly".</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Post #24: pedr is the first to advance the claim the 4E didn't meet the financial goals WOTC set for it. Fortunately, he still does not say "and you're a fool to like 4e because of its (supposedly) poor financial performance".</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Post #41: Staffan says 4e was a failure and "everyone" agrees on this. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /> -- this includes financial failure, of course: "a game with those sales would have been a roaring success for any other company, but not for Wizards". So here we start to link finances to whether it's OK for someone to enjoy 4e as a game.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">#53: mamba would like to reiterate that 4e sales dropped before Essentials. Cool? I don't think that was ever being debated?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">#75: in response to Ezekiel's claim that 4e didn't fail, mamba drops the hammer with, "it was the <strong>worst selling edition</strong> with sales <strong>falling off a cliff</strong> pretty soon [...] Did 4e have some fans, clearly, we still have them lamenting the fact that it failed and even <strong>claiming that it did not fail</strong>, that WotC was just unreasonable and shelved it."</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">and on and on from there</li> </ul><p>So if you think you tricked me into showing that >I< was the one who brought up sales? Nope.</p><p>That >I< was the one who tried to tie a game's financial performance to how fun it is? Nope. (In fact I specifically mocked this.)</p><p></p><p>I didn't bring the fight but I also won't shy away from it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Joshua Randall, post: 9569511, member: 7737"] Are you for real right now? OK let's do this. [LIST] [*]Post #1: the drive-by of the blog article. [*]Post #2: me, complaining about its inaccuracies, including release dates of 4e relative to Pathfinder (the game system). [*]Post #3: Alzrius debates my Pathfinder dates. This continues for a while. [*]Post #15: Tigris mentions that sales of 4e --> Essentials may have dropped more than 3e --> 3.5. However he mentioned it in a neutral way and it's relatively noncontroversial. He very importantly does NOT say "and you are a fool if you like 4e because it sold poorly". [*]Post #24: pedr is the first to advance the claim the 4E didn't meet the financial goals WOTC set for it. Fortunately, he still does not say "and you're a fool to like 4e because of its (supposedly) poor financial performance". [*]Post #41: Staffan says 4e was a failure and "everyone" agrees on this. :( -- this includes financial failure, of course: "a game with those sales would have been a roaring success for any other company, but not for Wizards". So here we start to link finances to whether it's OK for someone to enjoy 4e as a game. [*]#53: mamba would like to reiterate that 4e sales dropped before Essentials. Cool? I don't think that was ever being debated? [*]#75: in response to Ezekiel's claim that 4e didn't fail, mamba drops the hammer with, "it was the [B]worst selling edition[/B] with sales [B]falling off a cliff[/B] pretty soon [...] Did 4e have some fans, clearly, we still have them lamenting the fact that it failed and even [B]claiming that it did not fail[/B], that WotC was just unreasonable and shelved it." [*]and on and on from there [/LIST] So if you think you tricked me into showing that >I< was the one who brought up sales? Nope. That >I< was the one who tried to tie a game's financial performance to how fun it is? Nope. (In fact I specifically mocked this.) I didn't bring the fight but I also won't shy away from it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Promotions/Press
The D&D 4th edition Rennaissaince: A look into the history of the edition, its flaws and its merits
Top