Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The D&D Business Model
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arashi Ravenblade" data-source="post: 2990329" data-attributes="member: 15630"><p>This is just pure speculation but wouldnt it seem that WOTC releases products that really only the DM can use and most players will never look through, or buy?</p><p>Most groups are what 3-6 players including the DM? The Dm would pick up most of the books he finds he will need and the players either barrow them or never see them. As for player products most groups only have 1 or 2 copies. My group has for example 2 copies of most of the complete books. The other players have no reason to buy the others as they can use a friends copy. </p><p>So it would seem that WOTC could stop producing books that are more DM centric, and just because the book has alot of feats, or classes in it does not make it automatically player driven. I for one would consider the FR books to be DM specific with some player stuff thrown in.</p><p>With groups only buying a few copies of a book at a time or copying out the pages they need, causes the product to be driven down in sales. Maybe they need to estimate how many cpoies a book could possibly sell and do a lower run on them until deman arises again.</p><p>They also need to reduce costs of the book. 34 for the new MM is not worth the price. </p><p>A 160 page book should be no more than 25 bucks and im being generous with that. How many people wont buy a book based on price? If a 160 page book cost 20 or 25 bucks and 50 people where willing to buy it how much would you make than say upping the price to 30 and now only 25 people are willing to buy it? And thats will the assumption that it only cost them a 4th of the cover price to make (though i really have no idea what it would really cost). </p><p>But the real problem i dont think is WOTC but with Hasbro. I think Wotc would of had a little more sense in dealing with the D&D liscence had Hasbro not been involved.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arashi Ravenblade, post: 2990329, member: 15630"] This is just pure speculation but wouldnt it seem that WOTC releases products that really only the DM can use and most players will never look through, or buy? Most groups are what 3-6 players including the DM? The Dm would pick up most of the books he finds he will need and the players either barrow them or never see them. As for player products most groups only have 1 or 2 copies. My group has for example 2 copies of most of the complete books. The other players have no reason to buy the others as they can use a friends copy. So it would seem that WOTC could stop producing books that are more DM centric, and just because the book has alot of feats, or classes in it does not make it automatically player driven. I for one would consider the FR books to be DM specific with some player stuff thrown in. With groups only buying a few copies of a book at a time or copying out the pages they need, causes the product to be driven down in sales. Maybe they need to estimate how many cpoies a book could possibly sell and do a lower run on them until deman arises again. They also need to reduce costs of the book. 34 for the new MM is not worth the price. A 160 page book should be no more than 25 bucks and im being generous with that. How many people wont buy a book based on price? If a 160 page book cost 20 or 25 bucks and 50 people where willing to buy it how much would you make than say upping the price to 30 and now only 25 people are willing to buy it? And thats will the assumption that it only cost them a 4th of the cover price to make (though i really have no idea what it would really cost). But the real problem i dont think is WOTC but with Hasbro. I think Wotc would of had a little more sense in dealing with the D&D liscence had Hasbro not been involved. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The D&D Business Model
Top