Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The D&D Experience (or, All Roads lead to Rome)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 5457467" data-attributes="member: 18280"><p>Working to share a common definition can be done by (a) working together, if both parties wish to, or (b) accepting the other definition <em><strong>for the sake of this conversation only</strong></em>.</p><p></p><p>You might be familiar with both principles, because I have employed both in "conversations" with you over the course of the years.</p><p></p><p>It is only if you demand that the other person alter his/her definition that the "conversation just ended".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>"X isn't Y to me" =/= "X isn't Y to you" and certainly =/= "You are doing something wrong".</p><p></p><p>So, yes, I am still warm and fuzzy!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And, yes, I am <em><strong>still</strong></em> warm and fuzzy!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Or, you could just assume that you and the speaker are both right, because you are using different defining parameters for "D&D" (and/or 3e and/or 4e...such as, for example, a limited knowledge of 3e or 4e, which both you and I know happens). </p><p></p><p>In which case, there is no line, and you can still be warm and fuzzy.</p><p></p><p></p><p>RC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 5457467, member: 18280"] Working to share a common definition can be done by (a) working together, if both parties wish to, or (b) accepting the other definition [I][B]for the sake of this conversation only[/B][/I]. You might be familiar with both principles, because I have employed both in "conversations" with you over the course of the years. It is only if you demand that the other person alter his/her definition that the "conversation just ended". "X isn't Y to me" =/= "X isn't Y to you" and certainly =/= "You are doing something wrong". So, yes, I am still warm and fuzzy! And, yes, I am [I][B]still[/B][/I] warm and fuzzy! Or, you could just assume that you and the speaker are both right, because you are using different defining parameters for "D&D" (and/or 3e and/or 4e...such as, for example, a limited knowledge of 3e or 4e, which both you and I know happens). In which case, there is no line, and you can still be warm and fuzzy. RC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The D&D Experience (or, All Roads lead to Rome)
Top