Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The DDXP are you seeing the elephant or just the tail?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Miar" data-source="post: 4083558" data-attributes="member: 53348"><p>Reading all these discussions I find myself rather frustrated. It seems like people are taking the DDXP as the game rather than as a limited set of combat mechanics examples. It has been stated (correct me if my memory is off wrong here) that there is a bunch of "roleplay" stuff and rules for rituals we haven't got a look at yet, somethings were simplified for convention play, and somethings coming from the DDXP have already been changed. </p><p></p><p> Comments from people who have played the game as playtesters also seemed to be pretty positive about the roleplay aspects. In one of the many threads it was mentioned (pointer anyone) that the gag order comes off the playtesters soon. I think a much better sense of the game is going to come from these people than from the DDXP. </p><p></p><p> Some complaints are about the fluff or the mechanic X that leads to game Y. I would not be surprised at all to see sidebars in the DMG saying if you prefer a darker game or have few combats in your game change the healing surge refresh rate or something. After 3rd ed came out they put out Unearthed Arcana. I wouldn't be surprised to see something like that here with things they didn't quite get to or things that shot yet another sacred cow and they didn't feel like they could risk in the core. That all said it seems like 3rd party publishers will have a field day giving the game different feels in fluff with minor rule changes to make it work. Sets of different encounter/daily powers and descriptors could give the game a much different feel. </p><p></p><p> One thing that was bothering me was the whole warlocks must use wands. I waited a bit and hey sure enough they don't. Maybe they give them some pluses but they don't have to use them and there are things they can use like scepters instead.</p><p></p><p> Let's wait a bit more on the hate until there is more info and we are sure what is hated is so ingrained in the system it can't be changed. That's not to say the play style is going to be your thing for that matter it might not be mine but Calm . . .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Miar, post: 4083558, member: 53348"] Reading all these discussions I find myself rather frustrated. It seems like people are taking the DDXP as the game rather than as a limited set of combat mechanics examples. It has been stated (correct me if my memory is off wrong here) that there is a bunch of "roleplay" stuff and rules for rituals we haven't got a look at yet, somethings were simplified for convention play, and somethings coming from the DDXP have already been changed. Comments from people who have played the game as playtesters also seemed to be pretty positive about the roleplay aspects. In one of the many threads it was mentioned (pointer anyone) that the gag order comes off the playtesters soon. I think a much better sense of the game is going to come from these people than from the DDXP. Some complaints are about the fluff or the mechanic X that leads to game Y. I would not be surprised at all to see sidebars in the DMG saying if you prefer a darker game or have few combats in your game change the healing surge refresh rate or something. After 3rd ed came out they put out Unearthed Arcana. I wouldn't be surprised to see something like that here with things they didn't quite get to or things that shot yet another sacred cow and they didn't feel like they could risk in the core. That all said it seems like 3rd party publishers will have a field day giving the game different feels in fluff with minor rule changes to make it work. Sets of different encounter/daily powers and descriptors could give the game a much different feel. One thing that was bothering me was the whole warlocks must use wands. I waited a bit and hey sure enough they don't. Maybe they give them some pluses but they don't have to use them and there are things they can use like scepters instead. Let's wait a bit more on the hate until there is more info and we are sure what is hated is so ingrained in the system it can't be changed. That's not to say the play style is going to be your thing for that matter it might not be mine but Calm . . . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The DDXP are you seeing the elephant or just the tail?
Top