Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Deadliest Archer of Them All
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chun-tzu" data-source="post: 335545" data-attributes="member: 1441"><p>Can an elven cleric of Labelas be an effective archer? Yes. Is it as good as an Arcane Archer, Peerless Archer, or one of the other PrCs? That's debatable.</p><p></p><p>The biggest difference is the cleric's reliance on spells. This is an important limitation, although it's not necessarily limiting if you've got a lenient (or naive) DM. Spells take time to cast. Spells can be dispelled. Spells don't work in antimagic areas. Spells run out. Spells must be prepared (i.e., don't get caught unprepared). Maybe 80 or 90% of the time, none of these things will be problematic. But that's not the same as having real skills.</p><p></p><p>From a balance perspective, a super-buffed character probably should be better than a non-buffed or mildly buffed character. That's more an issue of the level of magic in a D&D game than character effectiveness, and at high levels, everything is skewed towards high magic characters.</p><p></p><p>Clerics archers have no cover penetration. If your opponents never fight from cover, no problem. But a character with nine-tenths cover gets a +10 AC bonus! The Peerless Archer can cut that to only a +2 bonus, effectively gaining an additional +8 attack bonus on top of everything. An Arcane Archer's seeker arrow or phase arrow will completely ignore that +10. "Then my cleric casts True Strike," you say. Okay, but how many of those do you have prepared, and it takes an action to cast it. The Peerless Archer can penetrate cover all day long.</p><p></p><p>How many Greater Magic Weapons does the cleric have prepared? In a high level, combat intensive campaign, I imagine it would be quite easy to go through more than 50 arrows a day. The cleric runs out; the Arcane Archer does not.</p><p></p><p>And clerics just suck in their skills. Even with their spells, they're no match for the Arcane Archer's or Deepwood Sniper's stealth. Clerics can't Spot to save their lives. Spot is such an important skill to an archer that every archery-focused PrC seems to have it (all the WotC ones do). What do you do if you're in the middle of a jungle and being pelted by arrows, but can't tell where they're coming from?</p><p></p><p>So, yes, the cleric archer is an effective archer and very effective character. Does it outdo a real archer at his own game? I don't think so.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chun-tzu, post: 335545, member: 1441"] Can an elven cleric of Labelas be an effective archer? Yes. Is it as good as an Arcane Archer, Peerless Archer, or one of the other PrCs? That's debatable. The biggest difference is the cleric's reliance on spells. This is an important limitation, although it's not necessarily limiting if you've got a lenient (or naive) DM. Spells take time to cast. Spells can be dispelled. Spells don't work in antimagic areas. Spells run out. Spells must be prepared (i.e., don't get caught unprepared). Maybe 80 or 90% of the time, none of these things will be problematic. But that's not the same as having real skills. From a balance perspective, a super-buffed character probably should be better than a non-buffed or mildly buffed character. That's more an issue of the level of magic in a D&D game than character effectiveness, and at high levels, everything is skewed towards high magic characters. Clerics archers have no cover penetration. If your opponents never fight from cover, no problem. But a character with nine-tenths cover gets a +10 AC bonus! The Peerless Archer can cut that to only a +2 bonus, effectively gaining an additional +8 attack bonus on top of everything. An Arcane Archer's seeker arrow or phase arrow will completely ignore that +10. "Then my cleric casts True Strike," you say. Okay, but how many of those do you have prepared, and it takes an action to cast it. The Peerless Archer can penetrate cover all day long. How many Greater Magic Weapons does the cleric have prepared? In a high level, combat intensive campaign, I imagine it would be quite easy to go through more than 50 arrows a day. The cleric runs out; the Arcane Archer does not. And clerics just suck in their skills. Even with their spells, they're no match for the Arcane Archer's or Deepwood Sniper's stealth. Clerics can't Spot to save their lives. Spot is such an important skill to an archer that every archery-focused PrC seems to have it (all the WotC ones do). What do you do if you're in the middle of a jungle and being pelted by arrows, but can't tell where they're coming from? So, yes, the cleric archer is an effective archer and very effective character. Does it outdo a real archer at his own game? I don't think so. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Deadliest Archer of Them All
Top