Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Decrease in Desire for Magic in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 8775282" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>For the most part I can agree conceptually what you are stating here and for you and probably others it works. But I'll say this for me personally... because all classes in 4E were on the AEDU format and all powers encompassed the exact same suite of grid tactics (adjacent damage, blast damage, burst damage, pushing, pulling, marking, knocking prone etc. etc.)... any so-called "non-magical" classes in the Martial power source did almost the exact same kinds of grid tactic actions that the so-called "magical" classes did.</p><p></p><p>Which means that at least for me I never felt any real difference between magical and non-magical powers other than the Martial power source not having ranged burst (AoE) attacks. Everything was just 'Move here, attack this/these creatures here, move those creatures over there, shift here' and so forth. None of it felt really different, even though we were supposed to identify certain ones as "maneuvers" and others as "prayers" or "spells". "Low-magic" campaigns and "High magic" campaigns did not exist as separate things, because for me the tactical board game felt the same both ways at the same time.</p><p></p><p>I do not doubt that other people did indeed conceive all of these powers differently and actually felt like maneuvers were different from prayers were different from spells. But unfortunately some of the rest of us did not. And that's possibly one of the reason why 4E maybe ended up being more divisive in certain circles than I bet anyone thought it originally was going to be and perhaps trying to recapture some of that 4E essence in 5E wouldn't actually solve the problems that people might think it would? (And not suggesting that's what I think you are saying, because I know you're not making that case.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 8775282, member: 7006"] For the most part I can agree conceptually what you are stating here and for you and probably others it works. But I'll say this for me personally... because all classes in 4E were on the AEDU format and all powers encompassed the exact same suite of grid tactics (adjacent damage, blast damage, burst damage, pushing, pulling, marking, knocking prone etc. etc.)... any so-called "non-magical" classes in the Martial power source did almost the exact same kinds of grid tactic actions that the so-called "magical" classes did. Which means that at least for me I never felt any real difference between magical and non-magical powers other than the Martial power source not having ranged burst (AoE) attacks. Everything was just 'Move here, attack this/these creatures here, move those creatures over there, shift here' and so forth. None of it felt really different, even though we were supposed to identify certain ones as "maneuvers" and others as "prayers" or "spells". "Low-magic" campaigns and "High magic" campaigns did not exist as separate things, because for me the tactical board game felt the same both ways at the same time. I do not doubt that other people did indeed conceive all of these powers differently and actually felt like maneuvers were different from prayers were different from spells. But unfortunately some of the rest of us did not. And that's possibly one of the reason why 4E maybe ended up being more divisive in certain circles than I bet anyone thought it originally was going to be and perhaps trying to recapture some of that 4E essence in 5E wouldn't actually solve the problems that people might think it would? (And not suggesting that's what I think you are saying, because I know you're not making that case.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Decrease in Desire for Magic in D&D
Top