Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The DM Hall of Shame
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Whimsical" data-source="post: 1728617" data-attributes="member: 3976"><p>Oh, I have one. It's so bad to me that I occasionally find myself screaming "NO NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!" at my memory, hoping my voice will go back into time to my ears at the time.</p><p></p><p>I was running a RPGA Living Greyhawk adventure at a gaming con and set up a combat scenario to be set outdoors during the night. I informed everyone that there would be regular concealment level of darkness outside so that everyone could see each other but there was a 20% miss chance for their attacks. The player playing the elf infomed me that he should be able to see just fine out here. I "corrected" him informing him that although he can see twice the distance with a local light source, that since the moon was so far it pretty much made everything the same level of concealment for everyone. Another player politely read the low light vision rule to me out of the book, and in my mind I thought that my explanation fit what he read. To the players' credit, they stopped trying to persuade me and let the game continue without further comment, while I was having the elf roll his 20% miss chance for his attacks along with everyone else (and he did miss a couple of attacks because of it.) <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /> </p><p></p><p>It was only after the con did I realize my mistake. I was really stuck on the idea that there was "light", "darkness", and "total darkness" and it was only afterwards did I realize that there were <em>four</em> levels of illumination (or lack thereof):</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><u>Normal</u> / <u>Low-Light</u></p> <ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Light / Light</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Darkness / Light</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Total Darkness / Darkness</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Total Darkness / Total Darkness</li> </ol><p>Now, this may not seem like a big deal to others, but I tend to have a high quality knowledge and understanding of the rules and tend to be the rules guru for the gamers I game with. And if I'm not sure about something, I won't state that something that I think is true is true. I'll qualify it or do some spot researching just to make sure. It's just that this time I was sure about something that wasn't true. And since I would like to be regarded as an expert on the rules and to be able to be trusted with my word, this little slipup pains me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Whimsical, post: 1728617, member: 3976"] Oh, I have one. It's so bad to me that I occasionally find myself screaming "NO NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!" at my memory, hoping my voice will go back into time to my ears at the time. I was running a RPGA Living Greyhawk adventure at a gaming con and set up a combat scenario to be set outdoors during the night. I informed everyone that there would be regular concealment level of darkness outside so that everyone could see each other but there was a 20% miss chance for their attacks. The player playing the elf infomed me that he should be able to see just fine out here. I "corrected" him informing him that although he can see twice the distance with a local light source, that since the moon was so far it pretty much made everything the same level of concealment for everyone. Another player politely read the low light vision rule to me out of the book, and in my mind I thought that my explanation fit what he read. To the players' credit, they stopped trying to persuade me and let the game continue without further comment, while I was having the elf roll his 20% miss chance for his attacks along with everyone else (and he did miss a couple of attacks because of it.) :( It was only after the con did I realize my mistake. I was really stuck on the idea that there was "light", "darkness", and "total darkness" and it was only afterwards did I realize that there were [i]four[/i] levels of illumination (or lack thereof): [INDENT][u]Normal[/u] / [u]Low-Light[/u][/INDENT][list=1][*]Light / Light [*]Darkness / Light [*]Total Darkness / Darkness [*]Total Darkness / Total Darkness[/list]Now, this may not seem like a big deal to others, but I tend to have a high quality knowledge and understanding of the rules and tend to be the rules guru for the gamers I game with. And if I'm not sure about something, I won't state that something that I think is true is true. I'll qualify it or do some spot researching just to make sure. It's just that this time I was sure about something that wasn't true. And since I would like to be regarded as an expert on the rules and to be able to be trusted with my word, this little slipup pains me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The DM Hall of Shame
Top