Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The double standard for magical and mundane abilities
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pentegarn" data-source="post: 6354684" data-attributes="member: 100714"><p>Why is it you felt this subject needed it's own thread? Why does there need to be an argument over these rules to begin with? You play it the way you and your group enjoys it, and leave others to do the same. Simple as that.</p><p></p><p>Some players might feel hiding behind another player and popping out for advantage and sneak attack is simply too gamey, and flavor their interpretation of the rules based more on the narrative story. Take the old 3.5 Manyshot feat for example. A player could use this with every attack. But think of it from a story point of view, such as the shot Robin Hood made in the old "Prince of Thieves" movie. He bit off the fletching on one side of an arrow, and fired two arrows, one into two different opponents. It seemed like a rare and impossible shot to make and drop two opponents, which made it appear special, and Robin Hood, skilled. But if he went through the movie biting off fletchings and shooting two arrows with every shot, it would have looked just silly and lame.</p><p></p><p>Some players might simply see that game as a game, where that type of thing is normal. Either way, it's up to the gaming group. Your opinion doesn't have to be everyone's opinion. You don't have to like the opinions of others. But spending thread after thread, post after post arguing about whose way is better is a pointless waste of time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pentegarn, post: 6354684, member: 100714"] Why is it you felt this subject needed it's own thread? Why does there need to be an argument over these rules to begin with? You play it the way you and your group enjoys it, and leave others to do the same. Simple as that. Some players might feel hiding behind another player and popping out for advantage and sneak attack is simply too gamey, and flavor their interpretation of the rules based more on the narrative story. Take the old 3.5 Manyshot feat for example. A player could use this with every attack. But think of it from a story point of view, such as the shot Robin Hood made in the old "Prince of Thieves" movie. He bit off the fletching on one side of an arrow, and fired two arrows, one into two different opponents. It seemed like a rare and impossible shot to make and drop two opponents, which made it appear special, and Robin Hood, skilled. But if he went through the movie biting off fletchings and shooting two arrows with every shot, it would have looked just silly and lame. Some players might simply see that game as a game, where that type of thing is normal. Either way, it's up to the gaming group. Your opinion doesn't have to be everyone's opinion. You don't have to like the opinions of others. But spending thread after thread, post after post arguing about whose way is better is a pointless waste of time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The double standard for magical and mundane abilities
Top