Menu
Home
Post new thread
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Find Us!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
EN Live
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Biggest TTRPG Kickstarter Creators
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Chat/Discord
Podcast
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
COMING SOON!
Sickness and Health: New diseases for your 5E game!
Home
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Dual Wielding Ranger: How Aragorn, Drizzt, and Dual-Wielding Led to the Ranger's Loss of Identity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 8260254" data-attributes="member: 7023840"><p>So the one thing I think is not quite correct here is that the TSR-era games (especially OD&D/1e) very much had the idea of protected areas within classes- what we refer to now as "niche protection."</p><p></p><p>While it is certainly true that there was often no significant backstory (in zero-to-hero, the character's story was created through play, instead of created through a narrative prior to play), the creation of a <em>party </em>was a group activity. We all know/remember that a party <em>needed</em> a cleric, but because of the way the game worked, you would need some amount of balance between classes- some amount of meat/muscle, some amount of healing, some amount of spellcasting, and some amount of thievery. Like the A-Team, you wanted a balance of classes.</p><p></p><p>We still see that today, but because the class-identity is so diffuse (no class is as weak in combat as the original MU, all classes have healing, any class can have stealth skills, traps are not omnipresent, most classes have access to spells (all classes if you consider feats and ancestry)) there is very little requirement of class diversity other than as a holdover from prior times.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 8260254, member: 7023840"] So the one thing I think is not quite correct here is that the TSR-era games (especially OD&D/1e) very much had the idea of protected areas within classes- what we refer to now as "niche protection." While it is certainly true that there was often no significant backstory (in zero-to-hero, the character's story was created through play, instead of created through a narrative prior to play), the creation of a [I]party [/I]was a group activity. We all know/remember that a party [I]needed[/I] a cleric, but because of the way the game worked, you would need some amount of balance between classes- some amount of meat/muscle, some amount of healing, some amount of spellcasting, and some amount of thievery. Like the A-Team, you wanted a balance of classes. We still see that today, but because the class-identity is so diffuse (no class is as weak in combat as the original MU, all classes have healing, any class can have stealth skills, traps are not omnipresent, most classes have access to spells (all classes if you consider feats and ancestry)) there is very little requirement of class diversity other than as a holdover from prior times. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Dual Wielding Ranger: How Aragorn, Drizzt, and Dual-Wielding Led to the Ranger's Loss of Identity
Top