Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Y.O.Morales" data-source="post: 2027669" data-attributes="member: 4783">Hi to all.Sorry I haven't settled the forums yet, but I'm still waiting for Morrus to contact me back with the proper link and procedure to do so. Patience grasshoppers.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />Hey, by the way, I just want to discuss a dilemma I have. My current GM friend will be finishing his campaign in a week (more like taking a long vacation) and for coincidence I'll be staring mine in 2-3 weeks. The thing is that I prefer and WANT to admit only 6 players in the group, but now a total of 9-10 players are crazy to play with me (seriously, I didnt know I was popular <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> ). On one point, they all are good players and I'm 70% sure that they'll focus on the game and don't delay the game session with interrumption (which is an ideal situation). But I still see that 9 players will slow down the game, no matter how good they are, and thus affect the whole session (by the way, most of the players and I are from the hardcore type that take the game seriously).The other conflicting point is that I don't know what to do with the players that may be left out. Simply telling them that they can't play is rude and difficult, specially when we all hang together.So, should I accept the 9 players (bigger group, more work, longer rounds and sessions, etc) or leave some out?</blockquote>

Verification