Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="airwalkrr" data-source="post: 2908705" data-attributes="member: 12460"><p>Just got my copy of the PH2 yesterday and I've been thumbing through it. (I always go through and at least glance at every page in a new book, reading tidbits here and there that I find interesting, before forming a general opinion on it. Anyway...) It seems to me like the Duskblade is an entirely unnecessary class. It's a fighter/mage. What is so original about that? Yes, they can cast in armor, they get free quickened spells (horrible idea btw), and they get an obscenely high number of spells per day, but the class is really just redundant. A spellsword is practically the same thing. It seems to me like all this class does is bring back the elf class from OD&D. Anyone else find this class unappealing for this reason? (Forgive me if threads have already discussed this topic as I have ignored most ph2 threads until now since I didn't have the book and didn't think I could contribute much useful to the discussion.)</p></blockquote><p></p>