Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Economy of Actions in 5e
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 5880823" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>In a sense, you're already playing 5e. What little we got to hear about the 5e demos paints it as a very DM-driven system. Not a lot of system, with the DM filling things in with his best judgement. </p><p></p><p>1e AD&D did not have a 'fast and light' combat system, unless you ignored a lot of rules - which almost everyone did. 5e sounds like it's going to default to not having many rules and letting the DM handle adjudicating things. Which'll be fine for experienced DMs, but might discourage newer players from getting behind the screen. </p><p></p><p>Another side of this is player dependent. In 4e, a player who is unfamiliar with the rules can ask how something works and get a codified answer straight from the rules. Can I move up to the door, draw my sword, open the door, and charge? No, because that's 4 actions. Cut and dried. Ask a 1e DM that and some might say yes and others no. Some players don't feel the need to ask how something works, they just say they do it. </p><p></p><p>In 1e, that was encouraged. The DM and player were both told that the player tells the DM what he'll do, and the DM tells him how long it'll take, even if it's more than one round. So a player might say, "I jump over the table, up end it to use as cover, take the two flasks of oil out of my pack, make molotovs out of them, take one each in hand, stand up, shout "burn baby burn!" and throw them at the orcs!" That's legit. It might take 3 or 4 rounds, but it's a legitimate action declaration.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm very leery of pushing things to 'optional' status. You rarely see games with lots of optional rules played in anything other than two ways: all options used or 'default.' Default will see a lot of play, if it closes too many doors it'll put off more experienced players. Anything-goes will see a lot of use. If a character that doesn't avail itself of every option isn't viable along side those that do, those games will be for elite 'system masters,' only, and will tend to put off more casual players.</p><p></p><p>Whatever actions the game uses, they all need to be useable in the default game. They may not all need to be spelled out, but they should all be useable.</p><p></p><p>For instance, in the basic games actions might be:</p><p></p><p>Standard: You can attack with a weapon, cast a spell, or CHARGE!</p><p></p><p>Move: You can stand up or move your speed or stand up if prone.</p><p></p><p>Minor: You can open a door, draw a weapon, or pick up, stow or retrieve an item.</p><p></p><p>Other: Your DM will let you know other things your character may be able to do on his turn or between his turns. For instance, when an enemy runs away on his turn, your DM may give you an opportunity to attack him as he flees.</p><p></p><p>A player who's accustomed to that could play at a table with other players who use OAs and interrupts and not be entirely confused or ineffectual.</p><p></p><p></p><p>In other words, the complete 'action economy' needs to be present in the basic game, it just doesn't need to be detailed or meticulously developed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 5880823, member: 996"] In a sense, you're already playing 5e. What little we got to hear about the 5e demos paints it as a very DM-driven system. Not a lot of system, with the DM filling things in with his best judgement. 1e AD&D did not have a 'fast and light' combat system, unless you ignored a lot of rules - which almost everyone did. 5e sounds like it's going to default to not having many rules and letting the DM handle adjudicating things. Which'll be fine for experienced DMs, but might discourage newer players from getting behind the screen. Another side of this is player dependent. In 4e, a player who is unfamiliar with the rules can ask how something works and get a codified answer straight from the rules. Can I move up to the door, draw my sword, open the door, and charge? No, because that's 4 actions. Cut and dried. Ask a 1e DM that and some might say yes and others no. Some players don't feel the need to ask how something works, they just say they do it. In 1e, that was encouraged. The DM and player were both told that the player tells the DM what he'll do, and the DM tells him how long it'll take, even if it's more than one round. So a player might say, "I jump over the table, up end it to use as cover, take the two flasks of oil out of my pack, make molotovs out of them, take one each in hand, stand up, shout "burn baby burn!" and throw them at the orcs!" That's legit. It might take 3 or 4 rounds, but it's a legitimate action declaration. I'm very leery of pushing things to 'optional' status. You rarely see games with lots of optional rules played in anything other than two ways: all options used or 'default.' Default will see a lot of play, if it closes too many doors it'll put off more experienced players. Anything-goes will see a lot of use. If a character that doesn't avail itself of every option isn't viable along side those that do, those games will be for elite 'system masters,' only, and will tend to put off more casual players. Whatever actions the game uses, they all need to be useable in the default game. They may not all need to be spelled out, but they should all be useable. For instance, in the basic games actions might be: Standard: You can attack with a weapon, cast a spell, or CHARGE! Move: You can stand up or move your speed or stand up if prone. Minor: You can open a door, draw a weapon, or pick up, stow or retrieve an item. Other: Your DM will let you know other things your character may be able to do on his turn or between his turns. For instance, when an enemy runs away on his turn, your DM may give you an opportunity to attack him as he flees. A player who's accustomed to that could play at a table with other players who use OAs and interrupts and not be entirely confused or ineffectual. In other words, the complete 'action economy' needs to be present in the basic game, it just doesn't need to be detailed or meticulously developed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Economy of Actions in 5e
Top