Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
The Elements of Magic - Teaser and Sampler (now with Illusion and Transform)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Verequus" data-source="post: 1301739" data-attributes="member: 9135"><p>Yes, I have one question.</p><p> </p><p>"Casting a spell takes one full round." "You cannot ready an action to cast a normal spell, because you can only ready standard actions." Magical skills are like spells and need also one full round. But: "To counterspell, you must ready an action and declare an opponent whose spellcasting you want to try to counter." This is a contradiction, because counterspelling is a only a special use of Dispel Magic (regarding the time of use and the +20 bonus).</p><p>There are four possible solutions (next to the one, that I'm simply wrong).</p><p> a) Counterspelling uses only standard actions, while normal dispelling uses full-round actions - but there is no logic behind that solution besides saving the full round-casting system.</p><p></p><p> b) To say, that counterspelling needs to be a signature spell - but then you have to use counterspelling in one of the precious signature spells (so one extra only for counterspelling?) and then the parameters are already fixed, but counterspelling has to be flexible.</p><p></p><p> c) To say, that dispel magic uses are always standard actions - but that breaks the default assumption of a full-round action.</p><p></p><p> d) To say, that Simple Spells (combining only enhancements from one list and the general enhancements) can be casted as standard actions.</p><p> </p><p>I would prefer solution d), but looking through the document I find the boon:</p><p> </p><p>"<span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong>Improved Signature Spell:</strong> The Mage chooses one spell list she knows. She can cast any spell from that list as a standard action as if it were a signature spell."</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Has one to be able to counterspell to choose this boon?</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">BTW, have such spells of such lists to be Simple Spells or only combined with each other to qualify for standard actions, or can someone simply use 0 MPs for a qualifying component and get this benefit?</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Verequus, post: 1301739, member: 9135"] Yes, I have one question. "Casting a spell takes one full round." "You cannot ready an action to cast a normal spell, because you can only ready standard actions." Magical skills are like spells and need also one full round. But: "To counterspell, you must ready an action and declare an opponent whose spellcasting you want to try to counter." This is a contradiction, because counterspelling is a only a special use of Dispel Magic (regarding the time of use and the +20 bonus). There are four possible solutions (next to the one, that I'm simply wrong). a) Counterspelling uses only standard actions, while normal dispelling uses full-round actions - but there is no logic behind that solution besides saving the full round-casting system. b) To say, that counterspelling needs to be a signature spell - but then you have to use counterspelling in one of the precious signature spells (so one extra only for counterspelling?) and then the parameters are already fixed, but counterspelling has to be flexible. c) To say, that dispel magic uses are always standard actions - but that breaks the default assumption of a full-round action. d) To say, that Simple Spells (combining only enhancements from one list and the general enhancements) can be casted as standard actions. I would prefer solution d), but looking through the document I find the boon: "[size=3][font=Times New Roman][b]Improved Signature Spell:[/b] The Mage chooses one spell list she knows. She can cast any spell from that list as a standard action as if it were a signature spell."[/font][/size] [size=3][font=Times New Roman]Has one to be able to counterspell to choose this boon?[/font][/size] [size=3][font=Times New Roman]BTW, have such spells of such lists to be Simple Spells or only combined with each other to qualify for standard actions, or can someone simply use 0 MPs for a qualifying component and get this benefit?[/font][/size] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
The Elements of Magic - Teaser and Sampler (now with Illusion and Transform)
Top