Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Danzauker" data-source="post: 5614858" data-attributes="member: 1929">It's not the "ad" issue. It's the wasted click/refresh/time issue.There's a banner advertisevent right on top of this page, and does not bother me at all. I don't have to look at it and does not hinder the naviggation in any way.It's the "ads" that interrupt my navigation flow, like the nagging ones that come on top of pages in some sites until you close them, or unnecessary page flips like this case that annoy me.I don't remember who first talked about advertisement being the rationale for needing to pass from the article archive page to, for example,<a href="http://www.wizards.com/dnd/Article.aspx?x=dnd/dra/201107nerath" target="_blank">Dungeons & Dragons Roleplaying Game Official Home Page - Article (Merindaelion, Barony of the Emerald Blade)</a>before reading the actual article.Anyway, I think it's unnecessary and annoying. I don't care if the middle page contains a blurb of the article, a picture of a naked woman or ad ad. Stills it's in the way of something I want and I have paid for.It would literally cost nearly nothing to avoid this for subscribers and leaving on for the others, so it's only bad design.Plus, really, skipping 10 pages of ads in a magazine takes me less than the time of a click to the middle online arcicle page and back. I tried.</blockquote>