Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Essentials Fighter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 5258816" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>Yep. That's how 4e cracked the problem of class imbalance that had plagued D&D from it's inception. No longer did one class only get to shine when others sucked, everyone gets to have fun. No longer does the DM have to finagle his story around to challenge and provide spotlight time to the wildly different talents of the unlimitted-use-abilities of the damage-grinding fighter or skill-heavy rogue vs the one-shot uberpower of spells and whacky brokenness of psionics.</p><p></p><p>Of course, while all classes face nearly-identical resource-management isuses (and are thus much, much easier to balance against eachother), they still do differ greatly in 'fluff,' and each role is quite distinct. A fighter plays nothing like a rogue, even though they're both martial and both have the same number and useability of powers. A fighter played like a rogue will be ineffective, a rogue played like a fighter will be ineffective, briedly, before he dies. Wizards and Invokers play pretty similary, but Warlords and Clerics really don't. If you can get past the universality of general mechanics like power progression and keywords, the classes become quite distinct in feel. If you can't, then, yeah, Thunderwave and Tide of Iron will seem frustratingly similar to you.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>When people used to whine endlessly about class balance if 'Fighter SUX' threads and CoDzilla rants, I'd point out that it could all be fixed - it just wouldn't really be D&D anymore. I believe 4e proved my point. 4e has achieved class balance, and made the DM's task much easier. It's done so with a bit of elegance and a bit of kludginess, but it hasn't been able to hold onto quite all of the D&D feel. Far more than I expected, but not enough for everyone.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm afraid Essentials may be trying to get some of that back, by again giving us classes that feel different on a mechanical level - and, as a consequence, cannot be balanced with eachother save through heroic effort on the part of the DM.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 5258816, member: 996"] Yep. That's how 4e cracked the problem of class imbalance that had plagued D&D from it's inception. No longer did one class only get to shine when others sucked, everyone gets to have fun. No longer does the DM have to finagle his story around to challenge and provide spotlight time to the wildly different talents of the unlimitted-use-abilities of the damage-grinding fighter or skill-heavy rogue vs the one-shot uberpower of spells and whacky brokenness of psionics. Of course, while all classes face nearly-identical resource-management isuses (and are thus much, much easier to balance against eachother), they still do differ greatly in 'fluff,' and each role is quite distinct. A fighter plays nothing like a rogue, even though they're both martial and both have the same number and useability of powers. A fighter played like a rogue will be ineffective, a rogue played like a fighter will be ineffective, briedly, before he dies. Wizards and Invokers play pretty similary, but Warlords and Clerics really don't. If you can get past the universality of general mechanics like power progression and keywords, the classes become quite distinct in feel. If you can't, then, yeah, Thunderwave and Tide of Iron will seem frustratingly similar to you. When people used to whine endlessly about class balance if 'Fighter SUX' threads and CoDzilla rants, I'd point out that it could all be fixed - it just wouldn't really be D&D anymore. I believe 4e proved my point. 4e has achieved class balance, and made the DM's task much easier. It's done so with a bit of elegance and a bit of kludginess, but it hasn't been able to hold onto quite all of the D&D feel. Far more than I expected, but not enough for everyone. I'm afraid Essentials may be trying to get some of that back, by again giving us classes that feel different on a mechanical level - and, as a consequence, cannot be balanced with eachother save through heroic effort on the part of the DM. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Essentials Fighter
Top