Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Essentials Fighter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 5261506" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>That's sort of what I'm talking about, though. If they're both pink, but one is called "kewl stylez babi," and another is called "duchess's blush," and then the company phases out one for the other, whoever liked the other is going to feel like the new pink isn't what they want to have out of nail polish.</p><p></p><p>Or, in another parable, a dude uses a deodorant that he likes. In part, he likes it because, like every good consumer, he identifies with what he purchases, and the casing has a sort of "old wood" look, it's name is Deep Forest, or something else quietly masculine, and it smells a little musky and reminds him a bit of his father, while being distinct. Then, the company changes and starts to market their product like AXE, with XTREME SPORTS DUDES and idiot commercials about how women fall out of the sky for the scent and now they've changed the name of the deodorant to something like NIGHTSPIKE. It's the same scent, but it's not the same experience, and he doesn't identify with this new face at all. So he tells his friends he thinks the new commercials are dumb and that Deep Forest was fine the way it was. </p><p></p><p>The fact that it's just some superficial terminology changes doesn't mean that the product -- that the rule -- reflects what they want. In fact, if they see the things as basically identical, it becomes a superficial difference for superficial reasons, they realize how superficial it is to them, and they become disenchanted with both options. Lady goes to get red nail polish. Dude buys some hippie Whole Foods brand instead (and then grows a beard, but that's neither here nor there). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>They may be paying attention to what interests them. What interests them just happens to not be the comparative differences between two powers. They can still be interested and engaged with in other elements of the game, such as the princess that needs savin' from the dragon.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Different things for different players, but remember that classes are fantasy archetypes. They're picking up on the fact that the Ranger is Legolas and that the Warlock is basically like a mythical witch. They're playing one if they want to shoot arrows all over the place into everything, they're playing the other if they want to deceive and coerce. Then they see that, deception or arrows, it all comes down to "pew pew pew" on your chosen mark.</p><p></p><p>At least, that was more or less my path. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure. But that's still just on paper. What am I doing in play? "pew pew pew" in both cases.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 5261506, member: 2067"] That's sort of what I'm talking about, though. If they're both pink, but one is called "kewl stylez babi," and another is called "duchess's blush," and then the company phases out one for the other, whoever liked the other is going to feel like the new pink isn't what they want to have out of nail polish. Or, in another parable, a dude uses a deodorant that he likes. In part, he likes it because, like every good consumer, he identifies with what he purchases, and the casing has a sort of "old wood" look, it's name is Deep Forest, or something else quietly masculine, and it smells a little musky and reminds him a bit of his father, while being distinct. Then, the company changes and starts to market their product like AXE, with XTREME SPORTS DUDES and idiot commercials about how women fall out of the sky for the scent and now they've changed the name of the deodorant to something like NIGHTSPIKE. It's the same scent, but it's not the same experience, and he doesn't identify with this new face at all. So he tells his friends he thinks the new commercials are dumb and that Deep Forest was fine the way it was. The fact that it's just some superficial terminology changes doesn't mean that the product -- that the rule -- reflects what they want. In fact, if they see the things as basically identical, it becomes a superficial difference for superficial reasons, they realize how superficial it is to them, and they become disenchanted with both options. Lady goes to get red nail polish. Dude buys some hippie Whole Foods brand instead (and then grows a beard, but that's neither here nor there). They may be paying attention to what interests them. What interests them just happens to not be the comparative differences between two powers. They can still be interested and engaged with in other elements of the game, such as the princess that needs savin' from the dragon. Different things for different players, but remember that classes are fantasy archetypes. They're picking up on the fact that the Ranger is Legolas and that the Warlock is basically like a mythical witch. They're playing one if they want to shoot arrows all over the place into everything, they're playing the other if they want to deceive and coerce. Then they see that, deception or arrows, it all comes down to "pew pew pew" on your chosen mark. At least, that was more or less my path. Sure. But that's still just on paper. What am I doing in play? "pew pew pew" in both cases. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Essentials Fighter
Top