Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The ethics of ... death
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ahnehnois" data-source="post: 6160239" data-attributes="member: 17106"><p>It's never come up that I can recall. Not a lot of PC deaths since I instituted this policy. If it did, it would be interesting.</p><p></p><p>All fair points. I am a pacifist and my players know this, so they likely interpret the rule in that context. I would describe capital punishment as evil, period, in a D&D context. A paladin can kill an opponent in combat who represents an active threat, but I would never consider it a permissible act to kill a sentient creature that cannot defend itself.</p><p></p><p>However, all characters can perform evil acts. Some people might indeed be willing to justify the restoration of a great hero, even at great cost, if they believe it serves the greater good. Sacrificing a mindless or evil creature to restore such a hero is arguably less evil than your typical evil cultist sacrificing someone for personal power or something. That's where I'm waffling.</p><p></p><p>Some will, some won't. I could imagine that if a good character was the one being resurrected, he might refuse to come back. I could also imagine the party sacrificing a bear and moving on. (Though I place a lot higher value of the life of an animal than most people, and druids are a large part of my world).</p><p></p><p>I would. I allow unwilling sacrifices because of the interesting implications. I'd rather have a resurrection happen and be interesting than tell players they can't do it because no one of their level is willing to commit suicide. I also was thinking this way because the idea is from Heroes of Horror.</p><p></p><p>Another DM wants to do this with willing sacrifices only, that's great for him.</p><p></p><p>I say it limits the willingness of non-evil persons to use it. Which is most people.</p><p></p><p>And, on a world level, it limits the number of total resurrections. Every time someone dies, there's one less person living. Even if he gets raised, there's still one less person living. It's a sort of "Law of Conservation of Souls". This has important thematic implications in my world.</p><p></p><p>Or would elves balk at sacrificing humans? Or would rich people balk at sacrificing poor people? So many social issues to explore!</p><p></p><p>Totally. I don't think I've ever discussed my resurrection policy on ENW at length before.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ahnehnois, post: 6160239, member: 17106"] It's never come up that I can recall. Not a lot of PC deaths since I instituted this policy. If it did, it would be interesting. All fair points. I am a pacifist and my players know this, so they likely interpret the rule in that context. I would describe capital punishment as evil, period, in a D&D context. A paladin can kill an opponent in combat who represents an active threat, but I would never consider it a permissible act to kill a sentient creature that cannot defend itself. However, all characters can perform evil acts. Some people might indeed be willing to justify the restoration of a great hero, even at great cost, if they believe it serves the greater good. Sacrificing a mindless or evil creature to restore such a hero is arguably less evil than your typical evil cultist sacrificing someone for personal power or something. That's where I'm waffling. Some will, some won't. I could imagine that if a good character was the one being resurrected, he might refuse to come back. I could also imagine the party sacrificing a bear and moving on. (Though I place a lot higher value of the life of an animal than most people, and druids are a large part of my world). I would. I allow unwilling sacrifices because of the interesting implications. I'd rather have a resurrection happen and be interesting than tell players they can't do it because no one of their level is willing to commit suicide. I also was thinking this way because the idea is from Heroes of Horror. Another DM wants to do this with willing sacrifices only, that's great for him. I say it limits the willingness of non-evil persons to use it. Which is most people. And, on a world level, it limits the number of total resurrections. Every time someone dies, there's one less person living. Even if he gets raised, there's still one less person living. It's a sort of "Law of Conservation of Souls". This has important thematic implications in my world. Or would elves balk at sacrificing humans? Or would rich people balk at sacrificing poor people? So many social issues to explore! Totally. I don't think I've ever discussed my resurrection policy on ENW at length before. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The ethics of ... death
Top