Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
The Ethics of Two Way Ignore
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gban007" data-source="post: 9347507" data-attributes="member: 56488"><p>Well, some are clear ones I disagree on - similar to [USER=57112]@Gradine[/USER] 's reasons- ones that feel like they are being anti-inclusive / railing against more inclusive systems, but in a way that doesn't cross the line in terms of the rules of the site (though a couple I see have since been banned, so potentially did cross that line) - and I just don't want to read those sorts of views.</p><p></p><p>Others it is their relentless negativity on some topics, and the way they express it - e.g. as an example that hopefully doesn't cause an issue - Micah comes across as often negative on certain topics, but I find the way they express them a reasonable way, that even if I disagree with some of their opinions, they don't cross into the relentless negativity I see from other posters that seem to want to drag people's joy down. Micah states their preferences / why they aren't happy, but they don't suggest others are wrong to be happy, whereas others seem to basically accuse those who are happy of being badfunwrong (and use specific terms sometimes that are very much attacking, but won't list them here). Some of those I may agree with their general position in terms of whether I'm happy or not, but I don't like they way they tar those on the opposite side.</p><p></p><p>One other person I have on ignore, I don't know if I disagree or not with their opinions, as I find their way of communicating so opaque that I just don't understand their posts, and it takes time away from reading posts I do understand. I don't think they're communicating wrong as such, just a way that clashes with the way I read posts, and so makes my life easier to not see them as such.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gban007, post: 9347507, member: 56488"] Well, some are clear ones I disagree on - similar to [USER=57112]@Gradine[/USER] 's reasons- ones that feel like they are being anti-inclusive / railing against more inclusive systems, but in a way that doesn't cross the line in terms of the rules of the site (though a couple I see have since been banned, so potentially did cross that line) - and I just don't want to read those sorts of views. Others it is their relentless negativity on some topics, and the way they express it - e.g. as an example that hopefully doesn't cause an issue - Micah comes across as often negative on certain topics, but I find the way they express them a reasonable way, that even if I disagree with some of their opinions, they don't cross into the relentless negativity I see from other posters that seem to want to drag people's joy down. Micah states their preferences / why they aren't happy, but they don't suggest others are wrong to be happy, whereas others seem to basically accuse those who are happy of being badfunwrong (and use specific terms sometimes that are very much attacking, but won't list them here). Some of those I may agree with their general position in terms of whether I'm happy or not, but I don't like they way they tar those on the opposite side. One other person I have on ignore, I don't know if I disagree or not with their opinions, as I find their way of communicating so opaque that I just don't understand their posts, and it takes time away from reading posts I do understand. I don't think they're communicating wrong as such, just a way that clashes with the way I read posts, and so makes my life easier to not see them as such. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
The Ethics of Two Way Ignore
Top