Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="MNblockhead" data-source="post: 9347867" data-attributes="member: 6796661">Probably 100% of the time. I don't block people because I disagree with them. I don't even block abusive posters--I let the mods take care of that. Toxic posters just hasn't been enough of an issue that I've needed to bother blocking truly toxic people. They tend to be quickly booted from the site. A good example is that there are some people, especially during the OGL drama, who incessantly posted on how much they hated D&D. There posts were almost cut and paste jobs. And they did it in nearly any thread that had anything to do with D&D or WotC. So, like most threads. And people would inevitably take the bait and thread would get over-run with the same arguments choking out whatever the original topic was supposed to be. I've blocked people on both sides of the debate, just so I could actually read and engage with the thread's topic. It did mean that I may have missed out on their posts on other game systems, which I likely would have found interesting.  Most who I've put on ignore have been un-ignored. I only have two people on ignore. I should probably unignore them but they've been such long-time, consistent participants in such negativity and thread derailment, that I'm inclined to ignore them indefinitely.</blockquote>