Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aldarc" data-source="post: 7784333" data-attributes="member: 5142">What do the prevailing narrative elements of the tieflings in 5e entail? Are tieflings descended from yugoloths or demons in SCAG or other publications? Are they plane-touched anymore? How do they look in subsequent 5e publications? How do the subraces in Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes alter the appearance of the tieflings? What's the cultural impact of these "popular" alternate tiefling options from SCAG in the current Zeitgeist? Do we see this represented in the art to a significant degree? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused    :confused:"  data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> I was not aware that a single piece of counter evidence disapproved the prevailing trend? When I googled the "tiefling fanart," which is a certainly a wider net than "5e Tiefling," I did not get that picture. Most of the pictures fall along the lines of the 4/5e tiefling fairly closely. Skin colors will vary, as they do in 4-5e. Horn shapes will vary, as they did in even 4e. Almost the entirety have feet instead of hooves or faun-legs or tails. Not that many look like some of the more common depictions of tieflings from 2e Planescape or 3e Forgotten Realms. From an anecdotal perspective, I usually have one tiefling per group in 5e.</blockquote>