Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sadrik" data-source="post: 2469610" data-attributes="member: 14506">SBMC,The class is strong enough I think to warrant its inclusion. Yes it is sort of a loner class, but so is the rogue, ranger, and monk to a certain extent. I think they have a niche. I have gone with the luck thing pretty heftily now in my latest version. It is their sole ability now. You thought that the explorer was too weak in combat so I pumped up their potential combat abilities (chance strike and lucky strike).My original combat bent was to somehow make attacks of opportunity their forte. I would still like to develop that if anyone has any ideas.I don’t like the ranger combat tracks and would not want to make a pigeon hole for this character to get stuck in. So Archery- no. The hex blade is an interesting point. But they have a little more of a strange bent than this character does.I think I might change all the names of the abilities to reflect being more intelligent and resourceful than lucky. Well keep some of the abilities with a lucky theme.Instead of calling it the "Luck ability" call it "resourcefulness" or something...</blockquote>