Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The FAQ on Sunder ...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Patryn of Elvenshae" data-source="post: 3794675" data-attributes="member: 23094"><p>... and why it is wrong.</p><p></p><p>First, the FAQ's position. It was first elucidated in this Q&A, and has since moved into other questions ("Can an AoO provoke an AoO?" etc.).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The FAQ states that Sunder, like Grapple, Tripe, etc., may be performed once in an attack action, multiple times during a full attack action, or during an AoO.</p><p></p><p>The FAQ's answer is incorrect, as it is based on faulty premises.</p><p></p><p>First: <em>"If it were a special standard action, its description would say so (as the descriptive text for the Manyshot feat says)."</em></p><p></p><p>A description of an ability is only part of the rules for an ability. The full set of rules for that ability can oftentimes be found in multiple areas. For instance, Sunder, itself, is found on the table "Actions in Combat" under the heading "Standard Actions."</p><p></p><p>Now, there is a primacy of rules guideline, in which, if there is a conflict, the full rules text takes precedence over an example (including a summary on a table). However, this rule only comes into effect if there is, in fact, a contradiction. Since there is not an outright contradiction in this case - the rules text can be read in a way which does not cause a contradiction - this rule does not come into effect.</p><p></p><p>Accordingly, Sunder is a standard action in its own right because it is listed, in the table "Actions in Combat," as a standard action.</p><p></p><p>Second: <em>"Sunder does indeed get its own entry in Table 8–2: Actions in Combat in the Player’s Handbook. It needs one because unlike a regular melee attack, sunder provokes an attack of opportunity (although not if you have the Improved Sunder feat)."</em></p><p></p><p>This is demonstrably false.</p><p></p><p>The Grapple attack option has its own entry in Table 8-2: Actions in Combat. It can be used in place of a regular melee attack, and provokes an AoO (although not if you have the Improved Grapple feat).</p><p></p><p>However, the Grapple attack option is not listed under the Standard Actions header. It is, instead, listed (along with Disarm and Trip, the other two examples quoted by the FAQ) under the "Action Type Varies" header.</p><p></p><p>More importantly, the Grapple, Disarm, and Trip listings include Footnote 7, which, according to the table, means "These attack forms substitute for a melee attack, not an action. As melee attacks, they can be used once in an attack or charge action, one or more times in a full attack action, or even as an attack of opportunity."</p><p></p><p>This footnote is missing from the Sunder action's listing under Standard Actions.</p><p></p><p>Accordingly, if Sunder were supposed to be treated identically to Grapple, Disarm, and Trip, it would fit perfectly under the "Action Type Varies" header, accompanied by a note that it provokes an AoO (just like Grapple and Disarm) and bearing footnote 7 (allowing it to substitute for an attack).</p><p></p><p>Therefore, there is only 1 non-contradictory way to read the totality of the rules: Sunder is a standard action which provokes an AoO and grants a melee attack.</p><p></p><p>As Mistwell will no doubt agree ( <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ), there are lots of ways to get attacks which are not the Attack or Full Attack actions. This is just another one of them. So, just like one could take the Manyshot standard action and make an attack, one can take the Sunder standard action and make an attack.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Patryn of Elvenshae, post: 3794675, member: 23094"] ... and why it is wrong. First, the FAQ's position. It was first elucidated in this Q&A, and has since moved into other questions ("Can an AoO provoke an AoO?" etc.). The FAQ states that Sunder, like Grapple, Tripe, etc., may be performed once in an attack action, multiple times during a full attack action, or during an AoO. The FAQ's answer is incorrect, as it is based on faulty premises. First: [i]"If it were a special standard action, its description would say so (as the descriptive text for the Manyshot feat says)."[/i] A description of an ability is only part of the rules for an ability. The full set of rules for that ability can oftentimes be found in multiple areas. For instance, Sunder, itself, is found on the table "Actions in Combat" under the heading "Standard Actions." Now, there is a primacy of rules guideline, in which, if there is a conflict, the full rules text takes precedence over an example (including a summary on a table). However, this rule only comes into effect if there is, in fact, a contradiction. Since there is not an outright contradiction in this case - the rules text can be read in a way which does not cause a contradiction - this rule does not come into effect. Accordingly, Sunder is a standard action in its own right because it is listed, in the table "Actions in Combat," as a standard action. Second: [i]"Sunder does indeed get its own entry in Table 8–2: Actions in Combat in the Player’s Handbook. It needs one because unlike a regular melee attack, sunder provokes an attack of opportunity (although not if you have the Improved Sunder feat)."[/i] This is demonstrably false. The Grapple attack option has its own entry in Table 8-2: Actions in Combat. It can be used in place of a regular melee attack, and provokes an AoO (although not if you have the Improved Grapple feat). However, the Grapple attack option is not listed under the Standard Actions header. It is, instead, listed (along with Disarm and Trip, the other two examples quoted by the FAQ) under the "Action Type Varies" header. More importantly, the Grapple, Disarm, and Trip listings include Footnote 7, which, according to the table, means "These attack forms substitute for a melee attack, not an action. As melee attacks, they can be used once in an attack or charge action, one or more times in a full attack action, or even as an attack of opportunity." This footnote is missing from the Sunder action's listing under Standard Actions. Accordingly, if Sunder were supposed to be treated identically to Grapple, Disarm, and Trip, it would fit perfectly under the "Action Type Varies" header, accompanied by a note that it provokes an AoO (just like Grapple and Disarm) and bearing footnote 7 (allowing it to substitute for an attack). Therefore, there is only 1 non-contradictory way to read the totality of the rules: Sunder is a standard action which provokes an AoO and grants a melee attack. As Mistwell will no doubt agree ( ;) ), there are lots of ways to get attacks which are not the Attack or Full Attack actions. This is just another one of them. So, just like one could take the Manyshot standard action and make an attack, one can take the Sunder standard action and make an attack. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The FAQ on Sunder ...
Top