Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The FAQ on Sunder ...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="eamon" data-source="post: 3796117" data-attributes="member: 51942"><p>Since the interpretation of Sunder as a standard action only relies on table 8-2: Actions in Combat, and since the PHB's tables aren't always... intuitive ;-), I decided to look up the rule texts if the actions under the "Standard Action" heading, to see if the rule texts explicitely mention the fact that they're standard actions:</p><p>[code]Standard Action Rule text explicitly supports table</p><p>Attack (all types) yes (pg 139)</p><p>Activate a magic item yes (pg 142)</p><p>Aid Another yes (pg 154)</p><p>Bull Rush yes (pg 154)</p><p>Cast a Spell yes (pg 140)</p><p>Concentrate to Maintain Spell yes (pg 140)</p><p>Dismiss a spell yes (pg 142)</p><p>Draw a Hidden weapon yes (pg 82)</p><p>Drink a Potion* yes (DMG 213)</p><p>Escape a Grapple yes** (pg 156)</p><p>Feint yes (pg 155)</p><p>Light a toch with Tindertwig yes (pg 129)</p><p>Lower Spell Resistance yes (pg 177)</p><p>Make Dieing Friend Stable yes (pg 76)</p><p>Overrun yes (pg 157)</p><p>Read a scroll yes (pg 142)</p><p>Ready yes (pg 160)</p><p>Sunder no (pg 158)</p><p>Total Defense yes (pg 142)</p><p>Turn Undead yes (pg 159</p><p>Use Extraordinary Ability yes (pg 142)</p><p>Use Skill that takes one action yes (pg 145)</p><p>Use Spell like Ability yes (pg 142)</p><p>Use Supernatural Ability yes (pg 142)</p><p>-------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>* (action not described in PHB, though Activate Magic Item does</p><p> generically describe it and supports the table as well)</p><p>** Text is explicit that such an Escape is a standard action when using</p><p> Escape Artist. A normal grapple check can be made instead of a </p><p> melee attack.[/code]</p><p></p><p>The fact that the table in question is clearly set up to provide an overview of whether an action provokes AoO's, and the fact that all other standard actions explicitly mention they're standard actions, coupled with the fact that the Sunder description's text is similar to "Disarm" "Throw Splash Weapons" and "Trip", all of which you can use instead of a normal attack, and finally coupled with the FAQ's explicit interpretation, I can't really see any support for interpreting Sunder as a standard action which can't be taken whenever you could normally attack.</p><p></p><p>Sunder says "You can use a melee attack with a slashing or bludgeoning weapon to strike a weapon or shield that your opponent is holding." That certainly sounds like you can use <em>any</em> melee attack to do so, but context could expand the requirements - i.e. that a melee attack is a necessary though not sufficient requirement. That context, however, is only implicitly present in the form of tabl 8-2.</p><p></p><p>Interpreting Sunder as a standard action really requires assuming that the <em>absence</em> of footnote 7 in table 8-2 is an intentional signal indicating that it can't be used to substitute for a normal attack. Significantly, even normal attacks, ranged attacks and unarmed attacks are all listed without footnote 7, and they're all listed in the same section of the table as sunder, so that's not at all obvious. </p><p></p><p>The table definitely doesn't come out and say that it cannot be substituted for any other melee attack, and the previous evidence suggests that it can - <em>all</em> other standard actions explicitly say that's what they are, the FAQ indicates designer intent, and the rule text mentions that a melee attack can be used (and makes <em>no</em> mention of further requirements).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="eamon, post: 3796117, member: 51942"] Since the interpretation of Sunder as a standard action only relies on table 8-2: Actions in Combat, and since the PHB's tables aren't always... intuitive ;-), I decided to look up the rule texts if the actions under the "Standard Action" heading, to see if the rule texts explicitely mention the fact that they're standard actions: [code]Standard Action Rule text explicitly supports table Attack (all types) yes (pg 139) Activate a magic item yes (pg 142) Aid Another yes (pg 154) Bull Rush yes (pg 154) Cast a Spell yes (pg 140) Concentrate to Maintain Spell yes (pg 140) Dismiss a spell yes (pg 142) Draw a Hidden weapon yes (pg 82) Drink a Potion* yes (DMG 213) Escape a Grapple yes** (pg 156) Feint yes (pg 155) Light a toch with Tindertwig yes (pg 129) Lower Spell Resistance yes (pg 177) Make Dieing Friend Stable yes (pg 76) Overrun yes (pg 157) Read a scroll yes (pg 142) Ready yes (pg 160) Sunder no (pg 158) Total Defense yes (pg 142) Turn Undead yes (pg 159 Use Extraordinary Ability yes (pg 142) Use Skill that takes one action yes (pg 145) Use Spell like Ability yes (pg 142) Use Supernatural Ability yes (pg 142) ------------------------------------------------------------------- * (action not described in PHB, though Activate Magic Item does generically describe it and supports the table as well) ** Text is explicit that such an Escape is a standard action when using Escape Artist. A normal grapple check can be made instead of a melee attack.[/code] The fact that the table in question is clearly set up to provide an overview of whether an action provokes AoO's, and the fact that all other standard actions explicitly mention they're standard actions, coupled with the fact that the Sunder description's text is similar to "Disarm" "Throw Splash Weapons" and "Trip", all of which you can use instead of a normal attack, and finally coupled with the FAQ's explicit interpretation, I can't really see any support for interpreting Sunder as a standard action which can't be taken whenever you could normally attack. Sunder says "You can use a melee attack with a slashing or bludgeoning weapon to strike a weapon or shield that your opponent is holding." That certainly sounds like you can use [i]any[/i] melee attack to do so, but context could expand the requirements - i.e. that a melee attack is a necessary though not sufficient requirement. That context, however, is only implicitly present in the form of tabl 8-2. Interpreting Sunder as a standard action really requires assuming that the [i]absence[/i] of footnote 7 in table 8-2 is an intentional signal indicating that it can't be used to substitute for a normal attack. Significantly, even normal attacks, ranged attacks and unarmed attacks are all listed without footnote 7, and they're all listed in the same section of the table as sunder, so that's not at all obvious. The table definitely doesn't come out and say that it cannot be substituted for any other melee attack, and the previous evidence suggests that it can - [i]all[/i] other standard actions explicitly say that's what they are, the FAQ indicates designer intent, and the rule text mentions that a melee attack can be used (and makes [i]no[/i] mention of further requirements). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The FAQ on Sunder ...
Top