Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Meeki" data-source="post: 3813888" data-attributes="member: 17257">Its funny how many times people say the table is the be all end all.&nbsp; When the table does not indicate what can be used as an attack of opportunity or not.&nbsp; It merely says those with footnote 7 can substitute a melee attack to perform that action and use it on an AoO.&nbsp; however, if half of you would bother to read sunder, you would see it says you may make a melee attack to strike.&nbsp; This is NOT substituting a melee attack to do somethig else, like disarm.&nbsp; Nor is it a standard action, because, like ALL OTHER standard actions in that same section, it does not say it takes a standard action to perform.&nbsp; Come on, it says IN THE TEXT, it is a melee attack.&nbsp; It IS a melee attack.&nbsp; It mentions a strike, which follows a melee attack.&nbsp; The TEXT of sunder explains it clear.&nbsp; The Table does not contradict this.&nbsp; The counter arguments are loosely based on this table that does not contradict sunder being used on an AoO.&nbsp; Not only that but none of the counter arguments actually refer to the text of sunder, which is THE evidence that should be used.This is silly, please lock this thread the rules compendium clears up an issue that should not require clearing up.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Meeki, post: 3813888, member: 17257"] Its funny how many times people say the table is the be all end all. When the table does not indicate what can be used as an attack of opportunity or not. It merely says those with footnote 7 can substitute a melee attack to perform that action and use it on an AoO. however, if half of you would bother to read sunder, you would see it says you may make a melee attack to strike. This is NOT substituting a melee attack to do somethig else, like disarm. Nor is it a standard action, because, like ALL OTHER standard actions in that same section, it does not say it takes a standard action to perform. Come on, it says IN THE TEXT, it is a melee attack. It IS a melee attack. It mentions a strike, which follows a melee attack. The TEXT of sunder explains it clear. The Table does not contradict this. The counter arguments are loosely based on this table that does not contradict sunder being used on an AoO. Not only that but none of the counter arguments actually refer to the text of sunder, which is THE evidence that should be used. This is silly, please lock this thread the rules compendium clears up an issue that should not require clearing up. [/QUOTE]

Verification