Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Fighter Extra Feat Fallacy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="smbakeresq" data-source="post: 7243357" data-attributes="member: 28301"><p>Ok, so over the first 10 levels of his career the fully optimized for combat fighter get to do 50 more points of damage over a 20 round day, and then 100 more at level 11, as an archer as opposed to a ranger. That’s also assuming you the extra damage isn’t wasted through overkill, but that’s spilt milk.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The entire advantage a fighter gets is 2.5 scaling to 5 points of damage per round. That’s it. In almost every other situation in the game the ranger will be better and more importantly have more to do and be more involved in the game. That’s the point.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If all you are going to do is be the best in combat the advantage should be much greater, on the order of 10 points per round and then 20 points per round using your example above. Those feats you selected as to optimize the fighter should be for the fighter only, then it would stand out on its own.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Another way to look at it is this. Let’s say the base fighter chassis is everything the fighter gets now plus the whole Champion path, then you got to choose a subclass. That would be closer to the mark and in no way OP. Compare to the base Paladin chassis, the base fighter plus champion path is about the same, the base Paladin might be better and more universally useful and the fighter path would be better at combat, but only a little.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I am in a game now, I will try a fighter + Champion + BM subclass to see how it is at the table and post. I do think it would be VG at combat compared to others, but then it should be, isn’t that the point of the fighter?</p><p></p><p>I think what got Wizards in this spot is they needed a base class for “regular” soldiers and monsters and such that used to be filled by the warrior type. They changed those NPCs where they don’t really fit into any class that PC get but kept that mentality. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using <a href="http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205" target="_blank">EN World mobile app</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="smbakeresq, post: 7243357, member: 28301"] Ok, so over the first 10 levels of his career the fully optimized for combat fighter get to do 50 more points of damage over a 20 round day, and then 100 more at level 11, as an archer as opposed to a ranger. That’s also assuming you the extra damage isn’t wasted through overkill, but that’s spilt milk. The entire advantage a fighter gets is 2.5 scaling to 5 points of damage per round. That’s it. In almost every other situation in the game the ranger will be better and more importantly have more to do and be more involved in the game. That’s the point. If all you are going to do is be the best in combat the advantage should be much greater, on the order of 10 points per round and then 20 points per round using your example above. Those feats you selected as to optimize the fighter should be for the fighter only, then it would stand out on its own. Another way to look at it is this. Let’s say the base fighter chassis is everything the fighter gets now plus the whole Champion path, then you got to choose a subclass. That would be closer to the mark and in no way OP. Compare to the base Paladin chassis, the base fighter plus champion path is about the same, the base Paladin might be better and more universally useful and the fighter path would be better at combat, but only a little. I am in a game now, I will try a fighter + Champion + BM subclass to see how it is at the table and post. I do think it would be VG at combat compared to others, but then it should be, isn’t that the point of the fighter? I think what got Wizards in this spot is they needed a base class for “regular” soldiers and monsters and such that used to be filled by the warrior type. They changed those NPCs where they don’t really fit into any class that PC get but kept that mentality. Sent from my iPhone using [url=http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205]EN World mobile app[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Fighter Extra Feat Fallacy
Top