Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Fighter Extra Feat Fallacy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alexemplar" data-source="post: 7253725" data-attributes="member: 6874182"><p>and the Ranger is also a very popular class- nearly as much as the classic Fighter/Rogue/Cleric/Wizard. It's the first class that's going to undergo a major revision.</p><p></p><p> Popularity doesn't mean nobody has an issue with a class. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> Entirely untrue. Back in 3e, people complaining about Fighter blandness and martial/caster imbalance got us stuff like the Swasbuckler, Knight, Warblade, and swordsage classes as well as a slew of variant Fighters in Dragon Magazine. In 4e, WotC gave us the Martial Power source and the Warlord and made the Ranger pretty much another non-magical class. If not for the continued demand for the Fighter to have a little more depth, we likely wouldn't have gotten so much as the Battle Master in 5e. Also, the Champion archetype exists as an obvious reaction to those people on the opposite side of the spectrum who wanted the option for a simpler and more straightforward Fighter. They also removed the Great-Weapon Fighter's "damage on a miss" mechanic it had in despite it's general popularity among players only after a significant minority protested it in the playtest.</p><p></p><p> WOTC absolutely does listen to its players on this issue. </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p> If we couldn't discuss things that have no impact on reality on online forums, what would forums be good for? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue :P" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" /></p><p></p><p> In all seriousness, one of the reasons I visit these forums (among other places) is to read other peoples' opinions, analysis, ideas, and fixes to inspire my own homebrewing. There wouldn't be much analysis/ideas/fixes to be had if everyone were in unanimous agreement that the game was perfectly complete as is and there was nothing worthy of being altered for any legitimate reason.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alexemplar, post: 7253725, member: 6874182"] and the Ranger is also a very popular class- nearly as much as the classic Fighter/Rogue/Cleric/Wizard. It's the first class that's going to undergo a major revision. Popularity doesn't mean nobody has an issue with a class. Entirely untrue. Back in 3e, people complaining about Fighter blandness and martial/caster imbalance got us stuff like the Swasbuckler, Knight, Warblade, and swordsage classes as well as a slew of variant Fighters in Dragon Magazine. In 4e, WotC gave us the Martial Power source and the Warlord and made the Ranger pretty much another non-magical class. If not for the continued demand for the Fighter to have a little more depth, we likely wouldn't have gotten so much as the Battle Master in 5e. Also, the Champion archetype exists as an obvious reaction to those people on the opposite side of the spectrum who wanted the option for a simpler and more straightforward Fighter. They also removed the Great-Weapon Fighter's "damage on a miss" mechanic it had in despite it's general popularity among players only after a significant minority protested it in the playtest. WOTC absolutely does listen to its players on this issue. If we couldn't discuss things that have no impact on reality on online forums, what would forums be good for? :P In all seriousness, one of the reasons I visit these forums (among other places) is to read other peoples' opinions, analysis, ideas, and fixes to inspire my own homebrewing. There wouldn't be much analysis/ideas/fixes to be had if everyone were in unanimous agreement that the game was perfectly complete as is and there was nothing worthy of being altered for any legitimate reason. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Fighter Extra Feat Fallacy
Top