Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 7253817" data-attributes="member: 2525">We're not talking about prior editions. They got feedback on this editions Fighter, starting in 2013. It's been positive all the way through. They have not received a lot of complaints about it. It has not been a controversial class, unlike other editions.  That is not the reasoning. I stated my reasoning so there was no reason for you to guess. I never said or implied the class was perfect. I said it's not getting complaints, is wildly popular, and therefore it's low on their list of "things to fix". There is no rational way to read what I wrote as implying I thought the class was perfect or that WOTC thought it was perfect. Total strawman for you to make that claim. There is no fallacy in what I said - they're not getting a lot of criticism of the class, and it's wildly popular, and therefore they're not feeling the need to revise it. That is true, and not a fallacy. Not only did I not deny they exist I said in the very thing you were quoting that I think it's fine for you to have those issues.You have this tendency to manufacture arguments for people you disagree with when they don't make the arguments that you find it easy to knock down. I wish you'd stop.  If you continue to do that, at least to me, I will slap you back on ignore again. And I know how that messes up your forum formatting and ease of use so if you'd rather not go through that pain in the butt please stop. I asked you nicely once before, now I am adding the stick. Your choice.</blockquote>

Verification