Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Fighter/Martial Problem (In Depth Ponderings)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9174977" data-attributes="member: 7030563"><p>You aren't punished though. I play fighters. I play Rogues A LOT. I am not "punished" for doing that. There are no negative consequences at all to being less powerful or as you put it "mechanically inferior" than other players at the table. And if I don't want to be mechanically inferior I can just play another class.</p><p></p><p>Further luck, especially when it comes to your initial ability score rolls contributes quite a bit to being stronger and weaker. </p><p></p><p>What would punish me is forcing me to play a Barbarian or a Druid .... even though a Druid is a full caster and not "mechanically inferior"</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You can do that advisedly already through class and subclass selection. When you pick a class and subclass you purposefully choose the mechanics that go with it, and if those don't suit other options are available.</p><p></p><p>What you can't do is remedy poor ability rolls. Those are locked in and beyond the control of the player make some players inferior and some superior.</p><p></p><p>If you choose to play a Champion Fighter, or any Monk you are intentionally choosing to play an inferior character as compare with other choices you could make (assuming level 5+).</p><p></p><p>I find this whole argument Bizarre. People choose what they play.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And that is what makes them great! I don't want balanced subclasses.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Putting aside for a moment that this is not possible, it is also would not be fun. Some of the races published in VGTM and later publications are by and large objectively superior to the earlier races and they are overwhelmingly popular. People LOVE playing these new races.</p><p></p><p>Yet you are arguing that the game would be better if Shaddar Kai and Eladrin were balanced against other Elves, if Goblins were not better than every small race in the PHB etc.</p><p></p><p>People LOVE the imbalanced races. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is not inferior classes that benefit more, it is non casters specifically, which are inferior at some levels and superior at others.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Your last post you suggested that the fact people did not want fighters to be supernatural was part of the problem, here you suggest it is bizzare that fighters can cast spells (i.e. do something supernatural)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Exactly as it should be. If you want to play a character with supernatrual abilities, play a character with supernatural abilities. IF you don't then don't, but recognize you won't be supernatural if you purposefully play a character that is not supernatural.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 9174977, member: 7030563"] You aren't punished though. I play fighters. I play Rogues A LOT. I am not "punished" for doing that. There are no negative consequences at all to being less powerful or as you put it "mechanically inferior" than other players at the table. And if I don't want to be mechanically inferior I can just play another class. Further luck, especially when it comes to your initial ability score rolls contributes quite a bit to being stronger and weaker. What would punish me is forcing me to play a Barbarian or a Druid .... even though a Druid is a full caster and not "mechanically inferior" You can do that advisedly already through class and subclass selection. When you pick a class and subclass you purposefully choose the mechanics that go with it, and if those don't suit other options are available. What you can't do is remedy poor ability rolls. Those are locked in and beyond the control of the player make some players inferior and some superior. If you choose to play a Champion Fighter, or any Monk you are intentionally choosing to play an inferior character as compare with other choices you could make (assuming level 5+). I find this whole argument Bizarre. People choose what they play. And that is what makes them great! I don't want balanced subclasses. Putting aside for a moment that this is not possible, it is also would not be fun. Some of the races published in VGTM and later publications are by and large objectively superior to the earlier races and they are overwhelmingly popular. People LOVE playing these new races. Yet you are arguing that the game would be better if Shaddar Kai and Eladrin were balanced against other Elves, if Goblins were not better than every small race in the PHB etc. People LOVE the imbalanced races. It is not inferior classes that benefit more, it is non casters specifically, which are inferior at some levels and superior at others. Your last post you suggested that the fact people did not want fighters to be supernatural was part of the problem, here you suggest it is bizzare that fighters can cast spells (i.e. do something supernatural) Exactly as it should be. If you want to play a character with supernatrual abilities, play a character with supernatural abilities. IF you don't then don't, but recognize you won't be supernatural if you purposefully play a character that is not supernatural. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Fighter/Martial Problem (In Depth Ponderings)
Top