Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Fighter/Martial Problem (In Depth Ponderings)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9183307" data-attributes="member: 7030563"><p>No. Paladins and Rangers don't opt into that, spells are an integral part of those classes.</p><p></p><p>Anything you do to boost martial classes is going to be something you don't opt into and will change the aestheetic of the class.</p><p></p><p>The question is supposedly how to change it to achieve this "balance" some players want and the relevant point in this discussion is that it is A LOT more about advancing the aesthetic THOSE INDIVIDUAL PLAYERS want than it is about actually achieving balance.</p><p></p><p>I also noted you did not answer my question - Is a Drow Barbarian a martial?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No it is not this for several reasons.</p><p></p><p>Firist it is to advance their specific aesthetic, to balance with that aesthetic and to the exclusion of others that don't meet their goals.</p><p></p><p>Second variety of options out of combat is not a universal commplaint. There are people that want this, but there are also a lot that want to achieve balance in combat, and if you look at the recommendations by the "balance crowd" most of the recommendations are primarily combat related.</p><p></p><p>Finally, there are already many options and choices for out of combat already based on how you choose to distribute ability scores, subclass selection and feats. The whole idea that martials can't be good out of combat is just plain false. The players complaining about this just choose to build fighters that are not good out of combat.</p><p></p><p>For example, an 8th Rune Knight can take her extra feat in skilled and have the same number of ASIs left as every other class. Compared to most Rogues of the same race with the same rolls, she will have the same ability distribution, 1 more skill proficiency, advantage on Slight of Hand, Deception, Animal Handling, Intimidation and Arcana checks. In addition to this she gets extra attack, the other combat abilities from the 3 runes, Giants might, Runic Shield, a fighting style (which can be applied to out of combat uses) and action surge. That character can be awesome both out of combat and in combat and that is without even choosing an out of combat leaning race like Half Elf, Damphir, Hexblood or Wood Elf.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Here are the page counts from the books I currently have with me that have been published after the PHB. Page counts are all rounded up:</p><p></p><p>VGTR: 4 pages of classes/subclasses, 0 pages of spells</p><p>FTOD: 5 pages of classes/subclasses, 4 pages of spells</p><p>SODQ: 3 pages on a subclass, 0 pages of spells</p><p>XGE: 53 pages of classes/subclasses, 25 pages of spells</p><p>TCE: 70 pages of classes/subclasses, 12 pages of spells</p><p>SCAG: 21 pages of classes/subclasses, 2 pages of spells</p><p></p><p>So that is 156 pages of material on classes and subclasses and 43 pages of material on spells published since the PHB in the official game materials I have printed and on hand. I know there are both spells and subclass options published in other books as well, so this is not a complete list. But I don't think it is going to change that distribution significantly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 9183307, member: 7030563"] No. Paladins and Rangers don't opt into that, spells are an integral part of those classes. Anything you do to boost martial classes is going to be something you don't opt into and will change the aestheetic of the class. The question is supposedly how to change it to achieve this "balance" some players want and the relevant point in this discussion is that it is A LOT more about advancing the aesthetic THOSE INDIVIDUAL PLAYERS want than it is about actually achieving balance. I also noted you did not answer my question - Is a Drow Barbarian a martial? No it is not this for several reasons. Firist it is to advance their specific aesthetic, to balance with that aesthetic and to the exclusion of others that don't meet their goals. Second variety of options out of combat is not a universal commplaint. There are people that want this, but there are also a lot that want to achieve balance in combat, and if you look at the recommendations by the "balance crowd" most of the recommendations are primarily combat related. Finally, there are already many options and choices for out of combat already based on how you choose to distribute ability scores, subclass selection and feats. The whole idea that martials can't be good out of combat is just plain false. The players complaining about this just choose to build fighters that are not good out of combat. For example, an 8th Rune Knight can take her extra feat in skilled and have the same number of ASIs left as every other class. Compared to most Rogues of the same race with the same rolls, she will have the same ability distribution, 1 more skill proficiency, advantage on Slight of Hand, Deception, Animal Handling, Intimidation and Arcana checks. In addition to this she gets extra attack, the other combat abilities from the 3 runes, Giants might, Runic Shield, a fighting style (which can be applied to out of combat uses) and action surge. That character can be awesome both out of combat and in combat and that is without even choosing an out of combat leaning race like Half Elf, Damphir, Hexblood or Wood Elf. Here are the page counts from the books I currently have with me that have been published after the PHB. Page counts are all rounded up: VGTR: 4 pages of classes/subclasses, 0 pages of spells FTOD: 5 pages of classes/subclasses, 4 pages of spells SODQ: 3 pages on a subclass, 0 pages of spells XGE: 53 pages of classes/subclasses, 25 pages of spells TCE: 70 pages of classes/subclasses, 12 pages of spells SCAG: 21 pages of classes/subclasses, 2 pages of spells So that is 156 pages of material on classes and subclasses and 43 pages of material on spells published since the PHB in the official game materials I have printed and on hand. I know there are both spells and subclass options published in other books as well, so this is not a complete list. But I don't think it is going to change that distribution significantly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Fighter/Martial Problem (In Depth Ponderings)
Top