Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Fighter/Martial Problem (In Depth Ponderings)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9189265" data-attributes="member: 7030563"><p>They do have the opportunity to get these things though. I think 6 of 10 fighter subclasses bring an extra proficiency to the game and Rune Knight brings both an extra proficiency and advantage on multiple skills.</p><p></p><p>Fighters have those extra options, so they can take them. Feats like Ritual Caster, Skilled, and Magic Initiate for example are intended primarily for non-casters and they gave fighters an extra ASis to take that sort of stuff.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Wizard subclasses are weaker than figher subclasses and the rules do tell Wizards they have to take and prepare a specific spell if they want to do anything, then they need to both prepare it and spend a spell slot casting it.</p><p></p><p>Wizards can really do it all but A WIZARD can't do it all and a Wizard that takes spells to dominate for the social or exploration pillars is going to be pretty weak in combat.</p><p></p><p>There are some tables where Wizards are afforded the opportunity to get the number of spells required to "do it all" but in my experience that is the real 10% of DMs. Most campaigns do not afford time to add lots of spells to your spellbook.</p><p></p><p>I have played very high level powerful combat Wizards and I never played a single one that had all 3 pillars covered or that was the best in even two of the pillars. The Bladesingers in particular I have played are the most powerful melee combat builds I have done personally but they are burning high level slots on things like False Life, Song of Defense and Tasha's otherworldy Guise like it is going out of style. They have low Charisma and lowish Wisdom, and at the end of the day, they have below average utility out of combat. Not none, but not a lot. My high level fighters have all been MUCH better out of combat than my high level Bladesingers.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't agree with this interpretation and a lot of those asking for more balance don't either. I don't think a lot of people went back to OSR. I know I started playing D&D in 1980 and I did not go back to OSR.</p><p></p><p>At the end of the day the fighter in 5E is only 100% combat if the player builds it to be 100% combat.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Most fighter subclasses offer extra skill proficiencies, at least one of the fighter subclasses gets expertise in a skill, another offers advantage on multiple skills and a third offers a 1d8 bonus on skill checks sever times a day that scales to a higher dice with level.</p><p></p><p>The skill expert feat also gives expertise while boosting an ability and a fighter has an extra ASI to devote to this if she wants.</p><p></p><p>If fighters did not have subclasses that offered this, or an extra ASI that offered these things that may be an argument, but those things are available to fighters who choose to take them. Som of those combos (example Rune Knight and skill expert) can be taken without compromising combat power at all.</p><p></p><p>As an example, take a Mountain Dwarf Rune Knight, Knight background at 8th level, who used his extra ASI for skill expert:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Your abilities are 2 points higher than most race/class combos (1 point for mountain dwarf, 1 point for skill expert)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">You have proficiency in 9 tools and speak 4 languages.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">You have proficiency in 5 skills, expertise in 1 skill</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">you roll with advantage on up to either 5 skills or alternatively 4 skills and all of your 9 tools</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">you have 3 retainers that can do all sorts of things outside of combat, including "Help" on ability checks when they happen to be around.</li> </ul><p>If you like skills more than tools, you can make the same sort of build using a half-elf and have proficiency in 2 tools and 7 skills, while still being 2 points ahead of other race/class combos in terms of your ability scores.</p><p></p><p>Another third option I can forgo the expertise, lose 1 skill proficiency and use my extra feat for Lucky and get to reroll a failed check 3 times a day (often in this case rerolling a check I made originally with advantage) and I do this while still having better ability scores than most other players!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 9189265, member: 7030563"] They do have the opportunity to get these things though. I think 6 of 10 fighter subclasses bring an extra proficiency to the game and Rune Knight brings both an extra proficiency and advantage on multiple skills. Fighters have those extra options, so they can take them. Feats like Ritual Caster, Skilled, and Magic Initiate for example are intended primarily for non-casters and they gave fighters an extra ASis to take that sort of stuff. Wizard subclasses are weaker than figher subclasses and the rules do tell Wizards they have to take and prepare a specific spell if they want to do anything, then they need to both prepare it and spend a spell slot casting it. Wizards can really do it all but A WIZARD can't do it all and a Wizard that takes spells to dominate for the social or exploration pillars is going to be pretty weak in combat. There are some tables where Wizards are afforded the opportunity to get the number of spells required to "do it all" but in my experience that is the real 10% of DMs. Most campaigns do not afford time to add lots of spells to your spellbook. I have played very high level powerful combat Wizards and I never played a single one that had all 3 pillars covered or that was the best in even two of the pillars. The Bladesingers in particular I have played are the most powerful melee combat builds I have done personally but they are burning high level slots on things like False Life, Song of Defense and Tasha's otherworldy Guise like it is going out of style. They have low Charisma and lowish Wisdom, and at the end of the day, they have below average utility out of combat. Not none, but not a lot. My high level fighters have all been MUCH better out of combat than my high level Bladesingers. I don't agree with this interpretation and a lot of those asking for more balance don't either. I don't think a lot of people went back to OSR. I know I started playing D&D in 1980 and I did not go back to OSR. At the end of the day the fighter in 5E is only 100% combat if the player builds it to be 100% combat. Most fighter subclasses offer extra skill proficiencies, at least one of the fighter subclasses gets expertise in a skill, another offers advantage on multiple skills and a third offers a 1d8 bonus on skill checks sever times a day that scales to a higher dice with level. The skill expert feat also gives expertise while boosting an ability and a fighter has an extra ASI to devote to this if she wants. If fighters did not have subclasses that offered this, or an extra ASI that offered these things that may be an argument, but those things are available to fighters who choose to take them. Som of those combos (example Rune Knight and skill expert) can be taken without compromising combat power at all. As an example, take a Mountain Dwarf Rune Knight, Knight background at 8th level, who used his extra ASI for skill expert: [LIST] [*]Your abilities are 2 points higher than most race/class combos (1 point for mountain dwarf, 1 point for skill expert) [*]You have proficiency in 9 tools and speak 4 languages. [*]You have proficiency in 5 skills, expertise in 1 skill [*]you roll with advantage on up to either 5 skills or alternatively 4 skills and all of your 9 tools [*]you have 3 retainers that can do all sorts of things outside of combat, including "Help" on ability checks when they happen to be around. [/LIST] If you like skills more than tools, you can make the same sort of build using a half-elf and have proficiency in 2 tools and 7 skills, while still being 2 points ahead of other race/class combos in terms of your ability scores. Another third option I can forgo the expertise, lose 1 skill proficiency and use my extra feat for Lucky and get to reroll a failed check 3 times a day (often in this case rerolling a check I made originally with advantage) and I do this while still having better ability scores than most other players! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Fighter/Martial Problem (In Depth Ponderings)
Top