Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Warpiglet-7" data-source="post: 9191059" data-attributes="member: 7025282">I think once this topic moved to a statement of fact it is reasonable to ask for some data that supports the claim.In terms of helpfulness, I can offer observations and opinions.  But I also would say if I don’t play say rangers, it is a bit absurd for me to comment at great length about them.Conversely I have played and DM’d for fighters.  If someone is saying something that is contrary to what I observe as a statement of fact I will listen to what is said and wait for some proof if I am interested.I am not making many statements about the highest tier because I rarely play to that point…yet.I genuinely was asking for some data about fighters  being unpopular…I had not heard that.  Now that I asked, it appears the discussion is more about playstyle and editions.  In those cases I can only say I know what appeals to me and what does not.At that juncture I am not trying to help per se and am acknowledging the limits of my experience.  What I am not doing is using the royal “we” and stating my opinion as a largely held truth.  Because it’s just my opinion…and so far, no one is able to prove even the unpopularity part, much less the other stuff.I was genuinely trying to see what I missed but really came away with somePeople really prefer vanilla or chocolate.  All good.if that is what it is, it’s fine.</blockquote>