Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9195148" data-attributes="member: 7030563">So nothing in Tasha's is RAW now?Other examples:  Multiclassing is only if the DM allows it, a custom Background is only if the DM allows it, languages are only available if your DM allows it, Armor fitting any size character is by the DMs discretion, A Cleric's god is based on the DMs permission, you can only use the Wish spell if your DM allows it.Is the Wish spell not RAW?  Should we not be allowed to use it as an example during discussions on class balance?Is it even possible to have a discussion about RAW multiclassing, since multiclassing itself is apparently not RAW?Being under the DMs purview doesn't make those things not RAW and it does not make this not RAW either.  This is a copout because people do not want to recognize it is an option for fighters.I will point out that my original point was that players are allowed to change subclass in 5E RAW.  That is a factually true statement, just like players are allowed to multiclass and use the Wish spell RAW.   If some DMs don't allow it, than it is not an option at that particular table, but that does not mean it is not a rule or that using it as described in the rules is not RAW.</blockquote>