Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Fighter/Martial Problem (In Depth Ponderings)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9201434" data-attributes="member: 7030563"><p>No if we are talking levels 3-10 most of the subclasses are worse at most of those levels (and to be clear there is no champion below level 3 where Barbarians are significantly better). The good Barbarian subclasses still compete through level 6 or 7, but then the gap widens quite a bit because of fighting style, better AC and the extra feat and it continues to widen through high levels.</p><p></p><p>This of course assumes you are optimizing, but if you are not optimizing, why are you complaining that you are weak?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>At very high level it is a great martial class (assuming a good subclass) at levels 5-10 it is the worst class overall by quite a bit, even with a good subclass.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But the point is the player playing the Rogue should be seeing the same thing the "newbie" player playing the Champion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Ranger is more of a Gish than a Warrior. With 5E mechanics, I think the Rogue as a class is more of a warrior than the Ranger is in general, although different builds play different ways. A warrior Ranger is a viable play style and build, but if you are optimizing your Ranger using 5E mechanics and Tashas it is going to be more of a Gish than a straight Warrior and if you build a pure martial Ranger who is not casting spells in combat, an optimized Champion is generally going to outrun most of them in combat at the levels I noted.</p><p></p><p>Reegardless your statement was Champions are "hilariously weak" which would mean they are weaker than most others. The classes and subclasses stronger to them are not relevant to that discussion.</p><p></p><p>Champions are as a point of fact middle of the road in martial combat. Put in all the "warriors", meaning all the Fighters, all the Paladins, all the Barbarians, all the Rogues, all the Monks and if you want all the Rangers. Then assume optimization and rank them top to bottom at any level between 3 and 10. Champion is going to be above average on that list.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This may be the case for you, but it is not universal, as others pointed out on this thread.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 9201434, member: 7030563"] No if we are talking levels 3-10 most of the subclasses are worse at most of those levels (and to be clear there is no champion below level 3 where Barbarians are significantly better). The good Barbarian subclasses still compete through level 6 or 7, but then the gap widens quite a bit because of fighting style, better AC and the extra feat and it continues to widen through high levels. This of course assumes you are optimizing, but if you are not optimizing, why are you complaining that you are weak? At very high level it is a great martial class (assuming a good subclass) at levels 5-10 it is the worst class overall by quite a bit, even with a good subclass. But the point is the player playing the Rogue should be seeing the same thing the "newbie" player playing the Champion. The Ranger is more of a Gish than a Warrior. With 5E mechanics, I think the Rogue as a class is more of a warrior than the Ranger is in general, although different builds play different ways. A warrior Ranger is a viable play style and build, but if you are optimizing your Ranger using 5E mechanics and Tashas it is going to be more of a Gish than a straight Warrior and if you build a pure martial Ranger who is not casting spells in combat, an optimized Champion is generally going to outrun most of them in combat at the levels I noted. Reegardless your statement was Champions are "hilariously weak" which would mean they are weaker than most others. The classes and subclasses stronger to them are not relevant to that discussion. Champions are as a point of fact middle of the road in martial combat. Put in all the "warriors", meaning all the Fighters, all the Paladins, all the Barbarians, all the Rogues, all the Monks and if you want all the Rangers. Then assume optimization and rank them top to bottom at any level between 3 and 10. Champion is going to be above average on that list. This may be the case for you, but it is not universal, as others pointed out on this thread. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Fighter/Martial Problem (In Depth Ponderings)
Top