Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CreamCloud0" data-source="post: 9209140" data-attributes="member: 7034710">oh, this part wasn't so much the thing i was referring to about not understanding,--it was this part, between the distribution of weapon availability and extra attack as well as similar class features i thought that making these effects equally applicable would make more weapons/fighting styles equally viable for those that are designed to use them and overall be a more significant benefit for weapon users than anything it would provide to spellcasters, (tangentially relevant: i know i've mentioned before that it frustrates me that GWM's prerequisite is heavy, the same trait that gives all small creatures disadvantage on attacks with them, cutting off both the best damaging weapons and one of the most recomended martial damage feats for them)oh true, i was conflating PAM's weapon requirements to sentinel, forgetting that they were two separate feats</blockquote>

[QUOTE="CreamCloud0, post: 9209140, member: 7034710"] oh, this part wasn't so much the thing i was referring to about not understanding,- -it was this part, between the distribution of weapon availability and extra attack as well as similar class features i thought that making these effects equally applicable would make more weapons/fighting styles equally viable for those that are designed to use them and overall be a more significant benefit for weapon users than anything it would provide to spellcasters, (tangentially relevant: i know i've mentioned before that it frustrates me that GWM's prerequisite is heavy, the same trait that gives all small creatures disadvantage on attacks with them, cutting off both the best damaging weapons and one of the most recomended martial damage feats for them) oh true, i was conflating PAM's weapon requirements to sentinel, forgetting that they were two separate feats [/QUOTE]

Verification