Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dco" data-source="post: 7100343">And my response is that it is not deeper, it is shallow and trivial, more akin to noise.I'm not being defensive, I'm only stating and describing what has happened.I don't have a problem with people sharing their view, but originally this discusion was about how to some people the &quot;identity&quot; of the class was not there, avoiding how the PHB treats all the classes that would be the objective way to discuss this matter things moved to what some names can signify for some people because of reasons, this changed to sentences that were only valid one way because of reasons, typical players were not valid and we had to fantasize about what the casuals would think because of reasons, and what they think has also to be directed towards the same point of view because of reasons, etc. I would have liked an adult talk but I only see arbitrary views that continue changing and evolving when someone contradicts that point of view. I don't have a problem with that, it's your point of view about this rare exercise, another one talked about panache and other things for the battlemaster. Good, but then the problem was how the phrase was constructed. When I told mine it was about casuals and not using the rules. Goals keep changing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dco, post: 7100343"] And my response is that it is not deeper, it is shallow and trivial, more akin to noise. I'm not being defensive, I'm only stating and describing what has happened. I don't have a problem with people sharing their view, but originally this discusion was about how to some people the "identity" of the class was not there, avoiding how the PHB treats all the classes that would be the objective way to discuss this matter things moved to what some names can signify for some people because of reasons, this changed to sentences that were only valid one way because of reasons, typical players were not valid and we had to fantasize about what the casuals would think because of reasons, and what they think has also to be directed towards the same point of view because of reasons, etc. I would have liked an adult talk but I only see arbitrary views that continue changing and evolving when someone contradicts that point of view. I don't have a problem with that, it's your point of view about this rare exercise, another one talked about panache and other things for the battlemaster. Good, but then the problem was how the phrase was constructed. When I told mine it was about casuals and not using the rules. Goals keep changing. [/QUOTE]

Verification