Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="robertsconley" data-source="post: 9060626" data-attributes="member: 13383">You neglect to quote the part where I sayFurthermore, if you read the legal text of the various CC license like <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode" target="_blank">this one from CC-BY-SA</a>.[ATTACH=full]289405[/ATTACH]What is Licensed Material?[ATTACH=full]289406[/ATTACH]What is a work?From the WIPO website.[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.wipo.int/copyright/en/faq_copyright.html[/URL][ATTACH=full]289407[/ATTACH]<a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&amp;height=800&amp;iframe=true&amp;def_id=17-USC-1822058778-364936160&amp;term_occur=999&amp;term_src=" target="_blank">For the US from here</a>.Section 3 License ConditionsFinally, section 3 was not written in mind with people making a work with different sections with different licenses.[ATTACH=full]289408[/ATTACH]If you share the Licensed Material i.e. the work. With CC-BY and CC-BY-SA you must properly attribute. And with CC-BY-SA. You must also do the following.[ATTACH=full]289409[/ATTACH]In addition to the condition Section 3(a) means that a literal reading of this means that this applies to the Licensed Material even in modified form. Thus entirety of your works must also be under CC-BY-SA.So what is happening out there with the mixed content works?What is happening is that current copyright law is very pro-author. If you only wish to open part of the work, state that clearly multiple times then if push comes to shove then it is likely that will be upheld.So hence I stand by my statement that you can but there is no standard way of going about this given the reasons above.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="robertsconley, post: 9060626, member: 13383"] You neglect to quote the part where I say Furthermore, if you read the legal text of the various CC license like [URL='https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode']this one from CC-BY-SA[/URL]. [ATTACH type="full" width="593px" alt="1688476568528.png"]289405[/ATTACH] [B]What is Licensed Material?[/B] [ATTACH type="full" width="592px" alt="1688476640259.png"]289406[/ATTACH] [B]What is a work?[/B] From the WIPO website. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.wipo.int/copyright/en/faq_copyright.html[/URL] [ATTACH type="full" width="620px" alt="1688476725736.png"]289407[/ATTACH] [URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=17-USC-1822058778-364936160&term_occur=999&term_src=']For the US from here[/URL]. [B]Section 3 License Conditions[/B] Finally, section 3 was not written in mind with people making a work with different sections with different licenses. [ATTACH type="full" width="502px" alt="1688477455370.png"]289408[/ATTACH] If you share the Licensed Material i.e. the work. With CC-BY and CC-BY-SA you must properly attribute. And with CC-BY-SA. You must also do the following. [ATTACH type="full" width="516px" alt="1688477540614.png"]289409[/ATTACH] In addition to the condition Section 3(a) means that a literal reading of this means that this applies to the Licensed Material even in modified form. Thus entirety of your works must also be under CC-BY-SA. [B]So what is happening out there with the mixed content works?[/B] What is happening is that current copyright law is very pro-author. If you only wish to open part of the work, state that clearly multiple times then if push comes to shove then it is likely that will be upheld. So hence I stand by my statement that you can but there is no standard way of going about this given the reasons above. [/QUOTE]

Verification