Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="robertsconley" data-source="post: 9062080" data-attributes="member: 13383">If the author released it as a single work. That is generally not the case although some zine and small press authors do this.<a href="https://creativecommons.org/faq/#if-i-create-a-collection-that-includes-a-work-offered-under-a-cc-license-which-licenses-may-i-choose-for-the-collection" target="_blank">I</a>f the author released it as a collection. Most RPGs and their supplements are not released that way.&nbsp; There are exceptions like Tome of Horror where each monster was stated to be under a separate set of credits if you used it under the OGL.In the link you cited there is the following.[ATTACH=full]289485[/ATTACH]In regards to collections, in the section that you reference explicitly, it is quite clear that any of the CC licenses with the NC (non-commercial)&nbsp; provision can not be part of a commercial collection. And if they thought of running a similar chart for share-alike it would be the same for the share-alike provision. You cannot remix share-like content unless the subsequent work is entirely under a share-alike license.[ATTACH=full]289486[/ATTACH]&nbsp;Again I will stress that all of this only matters if you are trying to avoid sharing the entirety of your material for whatever reason.Given the recent widespread use of CC I would recommend folks start contacting Creative Commons about updating their compatibility FAQ and <a href="https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-considerations/compatible-licenses" target="_blank">compatible licenses page</a> in the interest of clarity. Although I will warn folks that it is likely that the CC folks will approach this from an open content maximalist viewpoint.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="robertsconley, post: 9062080, member: 13383"] If the author released it as a single work. That is generally not the case although some zine and small press authors do this. [URL='https://creativecommons.org/faq/#if-i-create-a-collection-that-includes-a-work-offered-under-a-cc-license-which-licenses-may-i-choose-for-the-collection']I[/URL]f the author released it as a collection. Most RPGs and their supplements are not released that way. There are exceptions like Tome of Horror where each monster was stated to be under a separate set of credits if you used it under the OGL. In the link you cited there is the following. [ATTACH type="full" width="758px" alt="1688644794581.png"]289485[/ATTACH] In regards to collections, in the section that you reference explicitly, it is quite clear that any of the CC licenses with the NC (non-commercial) provision can not be part of a commercial collection. And if they thought of running a similar chart for share-alike it would be the same for the share-alike provision. You cannot remix share-like content unless the subsequent work is entirely under a share-alike license. [ATTACH type="full" width="691px" alt="1688644907135.png"]289486[/ATTACH] Again I will stress that all of this only matters if you are trying to avoid sharing the entirety of your material for whatever reason. Given the recent widespread use of CC I would recommend folks start contacting Creative Commons about updating their compatibility FAQ and [URL='https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-considerations/compatible-licenses']compatible licenses page[/URL] in the interest of clarity. Although I will warn folks that it is likely that the CC folks will approach this from an open content maximalist viewpoint. [/QUOTE]

Verification