Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The final word on DPR, feats and class balance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Warpiglet" data-source="post: 7438745" data-attributes="member: 6689161"><p>You make some good points. I will address one in particular and suggest another consideration.</p><p></p><p>Yes, I am particularly talking about cantrips that are upcast since this was referenced in the OP.</p><p></p><p>IF we do not use them and the fighter uses at-will attacks instead of big punch spells or whatever, what is the rub? The main complaint is that the sorcerer can do what featless fighter can do all day long but better. If they are not using cantrips but spells, the utility of-at will attacks is clear and there is no problem. I looked at available slots a moment ago. There are only so many.</p><p></p><p>If we only used spells with saves to avoid disadvantage, we are probably getting rid of the main cantrip 'offenders' like eldritch blast/fire bolt and if we are using 1st level spells or higher, we are using spells that are supposed to net a great deal of utility for the caster oft cited in this thread. Thereafter, we are again into finite resources or at-will cantrips.</p><p></p><p>A lot of interesting ideas in the thread. I have tried to take a step back. However, now more than before I believe feats are what is leading to the OP's main concerns--even if he says they do not.</p><p></p><p>He suggested that a sorcerer can essentially out-fighter a fighter if there are no feats. Sure, if a fighter is guarding him! If the sorcerer is not using at-will cantrips then he is burning resources which are supposed to represent versatility and big punch abilities. They are finite. And that is fine/working as intended.</p><p></p><p>In the meantime, even the featless fighter is attacking at-will without disruption.</p><p></p><p>My a priori assumption is that combat is not always neat and that anyone can be attacked. If the sorcerer does as much damage as a fighter or is at least close with cantrips, the fighter still has identity and purpose in leading the way and soaking hits.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Warpiglet, post: 7438745, member: 6689161"] You make some good points. I will address one in particular and suggest another consideration. Yes, I am particularly talking about cantrips that are upcast since this was referenced in the OP. IF we do not use them and the fighter uses at-will attacks instead of big punch spells or whatever, what is the rub? The main complaint is that the sorcerer can do what featless fighter can do all day long but better. If they are not using cantrips but spells, the utility of-at will attacks is clear and there is no problem. I looked at available slots a moment ago. There are only so many. If we only used spells with saves to avoid disadvantage, we are probably getting rid of the main cantrip 'offenders' like eldritch blast/fire bolt and if we are using 1st level spells or higher, we are using spells that are supposed to net a great deal of utility for the caster oft cited in this thread. Thereafter, we are again into finite resources or at-will cantrips. A lot of interesting ideas in the thread. I have tried to take a step back. However, now more than before I believe feats are what is leading to the OP's main concerns--even if he says they do not. He suggested that a sorcerer can essentially out-fighter a fighter if there are no feats. Sure, if a fighter is guarding him! If the sorcerer is not using at-will cantrips then he is burning resources which are supposed to represent versatility and big punch abilities. They are finite. And that is fine/working as intended. In the meantime, even the featless fighter is attacking at-will without disruption. My a priori assumption is that combat is not always neat and that anyone can be attacked. If the sorcerer does as much damage as a fighter or is at least close with cantrips, the fighter still has identity and purpose in leading the way and soaking hits. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The final word on DPR, feats and class balance
Top