Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Anubis" data-source="post: 132762" data-attributes="member: 2358">Nah, it's not like that.&nbsp; I asked it here, but only got opinions, which is fine.&nbsp; I wanted something official so that there would be no doubt as to what the RULES say.&nbsp; Now I have been proven wrong and have admitted it, but that does not mean that everything is settled.&nbsp; After all, it wouldn't be the first rule that didn't make sense.&nbsp; (Think of the errata that makes spellcasters pay XP components for every day of item creation, making items requiring Wish impossible to create altogether.)&nbsp; This simply means that the letter of the rule has finally been settled and that it's up to us to think of a reasonable solution seeing as WotC can't seem to do it.And for your information, I went not only here and to Sean Reynolds, but also to Monte Cook and the Sage.&nbsp; Monte and the Sage were strangely silent, probably because they realize that even though it's not what they intended, what I said made sense.Can you argue with that?&nbsp; What I'd like to know is why you are being so rude?&nbsp; I simply posted the information I was given and decided that with the official word known, perhaps it was time to think of a good way to fix it, because the whole system needs to be fixed and can be fixed with only a few minor modifications.This used to be a debate over what the rules actually meant, now it is more of a debate over how to fix it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Anubis, post: 132762, member: 2358"] Nah, it's not like that. I asked it here, but only got opinions, which is fine. I wanted something official so that there would be no doubt as to what the RULES say. Now I have been proven wrong and have admitted it, but that does not mean that everything is settled. After all, it wouldn't be the first rule that didn't make sense. (Think of the errata that makes spellcasters pay XP components for every day of item creation, making items requiring Wish impossible to create altogether.) This simply means that the letter of the rule has finally been settled and that it's up to us to think of a reasonable solution seeing as WotC can't seem to do it. And for your information, I went not only here and to Sean Reynolds, but also to Monte Cook and the Sage. Monte and the Sage were strangely silent, probably because they realize that even though it's not what they intended, what I said made sense. Can you argue with that? What I'd like to know is why you are being so rude? I simply posted the information I was given and decided that with the official word known, perhaps it was time to think of a good way to fix it, because the whole system needs to be fixed and can be fixed with only a few minor modifications. This used to be a debate over what the rules actually meant, now it is more of a debate over how to fix it. [/QUOTE]

Verification