Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="arjomanes" data-source="post: 6960024" data-attributes="member: 94951">Though it's deviated from the original topic some, I've enjoyed some of the conversation about the game's evolution and DMing. I think the game has naturally changed as a result of some of the issues that come up in game play for a sophisticated game like D&D. For instance, there were examples in early modules and articles in The Dragon talking about how to provide good balance in the game (avoiding Monty Haul problems; creating balanced encounters that won't unnecessarily kill characters), whereas in later editions some of those ideas were codified with mechanics. I think both ways are valid approaches. I don't think everyone who DMs can create a balanced monster, spell, class or item without good solid mechanics or examples. Now in some games, and for some gaming groups, unbalanced mechanics work well for the group. But some gaming groups I think want more codified and expected mechanics; others demand novel and unexpected results frequently. I think both games are D&D. Examining both OD&D and 4e side-by-side not only documents the evolution of the game, but also examines gameplay in different ways. Some modern D&D publishers like Lamentations of the Flame Princess, Satyr Press, and Goodman Games purposely address an "old-school" game style focused more on a philosophy of gaming and a DIY aesthetic that is interesting, but is certainly not the only way to play the game.</blockquote>

Verification