Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Joe Liker" data-source="post: 6374576" data-attributes="member: 6777505">Sorry, I have to disagree. I'm fine with it the way it is.Anyone who plays a spellcasting class needs to look up each and every spell on the current level of his class's list and read the full description at least once. Making decisions based on one-line summaries is not a good idea. Over the years, I've seen a lot of players do a lot of stupid things because they went off of the summary instead of the full description.Once you've read the full descriptions, you don't need the summaries anymore because you generally know what each spell does. If you need&nbsp; details, you should always be going back to the full description, not a summary page.I will admit that I wouldn't have minded a mention of school on the spell lists, at least for wizards, but that information is not necessary for any other class, so I'm fine with it being left out for brevity and consistency.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Joe Liker, post: 6374576, member: 6777505"] Sorry, I have to disagree. I'm fine with it the way it is. Anyone who plays a spellcasting class [I]needs[/I] to look up each and every spell on the current level of his class's list and read the full description at least once. Making decisions based on one-line summaries is not a good idea. Over the years, I've seen a lot of players do a lot of stupid things because they went off of the summary instead of the full description. Once you've read the full descriptions, you don't need the summaries anymore because you generally know what each spell does. If you need details, you should always be going back to the full description, not a summary page. I will admit that I wouldn't have minded a mention of school on the spell lists, at least for wizards, but that information is not necessary for any other class, so I'm fine with it being left out for brevity and consistency. [/QUOTE]

Verification