Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="GreyLord" data-source="post: 5430935" data-attributes="member: 4348">I don't think that according to the rules a Drow Druid/Ranger/Wizard is actually allowed....Of course with DM fiat you could do anything...but the same would also apply to 4e as well.&nbsp; You could have that Drow/Druid/Ranger/Wizard...and have strange rituals added in.Maybe you got that from the Race book, the Complete Elf...I never really was a fan of the Complete books, so maybe that's where I'm missing a rule somewhere.I believe elves were overall restricted to being cleric, fighter, mage, thief, or ranger, multi-class options of fighter/mage, fighter/thief, fighter/mage thief, or mage/thief.pg 21. 2e PHB.I see this postedIssue # please.&nbsp; I have all of them, though I would have to go dig it up out of storage.I'll finish up the thread...but that's the first thing that sort of struck me odd right there.I'll look up the article...issue #100?I still find it looking suspicious, but I'll look it up.However, in that case...since any rule is inclusive...First problem is that if you have a multiclass of any significance...you won't have those levels in 3e.&nbsp; Your classes are automatically reduced and hence your powers that you vaunt are reduced right there. (official conversion rules nerfed MC levels GIGANTICALLY). (what level was he so we can see just how much he lost when you did a &quot;conversion&quot; on him...you DID DO IT by the book?&nbsp; Right...since there was actually an 'official' way to do it as opposed to any conversions you do to 4e which is basically however the heck you feel like converting them).At least in 4e you could do a Hybrid Multiclass with Drow...if you are saying any rule is allowable...and that's not even including the Dragon rules...and you could even stay the same level!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="GreyLord, post: 5430935, member: 4348"] I don't think that according to the rules a Drow Druid/Ranger/Wizard is actually allowed.... Of course with DM fiat you could do anything...but the same would also apply to 4e as well. You could have that Drow/Druid/Ranger/Wizard...and have strange rituals added in. Maybe you got that from the Race book, the Complete Elf...I never really was a fan of the Complete books, so maybe that's where I'm missing a rule somewhere. I believe elves were overall restricted to being cleric, fighter, mage, thief, or ranger, multi-class options of fighter/mage, fighter/thief, fighter/mage thief, or mage/thief. pg 21. 2e PHB. I see this posted Issue # please. I have all of them, though I would have to go dig it up out of storage. I'll finish up the thread...but that's the first thing that sort of struck me odd right there. I'll look up the article...issue #100? I still find it looking suspicious, but I'll look it up. However, in that case...since any rule is inclusive... First problem is that if you have a multiclass of any significance...you won't have those levels in 3e. Your classes are automatically reduced and hence your powers that you vaunt are reduced right there. (official conversion rules nerfed MC levels GIGANTICALLY). (what level was he so we can see just how much he lost when you did a "conversion" on him...you DID DO IT by the book? Right...since there was actually an 'official' way to do it as opposed to any conversions you do to 4e which is basically however the heck you feel like converting them). At least in 4e you could do a Hybrid Multiclass with Drow...if you are saying any rule is allowable...and that's not even including the Dragon rules...and you could even stay the same level! [/QUOTE]

Verification