Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Maggan" data-source="post: 5440554" data-attributes="member: 6616">Probably because it would have been a defensive move, which is not commonly seen as a successful business strategy to follow. Most business moves are offensive, aimed at growing the business.So to implement a hold pattern for D&D, would probably have been very difficult for the people running the business. It goes against the instincts, I believe.Note that even if they had done so, the rise of alternatives such as Pathfinder could still have been a feasible outcome. And it would have been interesting to see how 4e would have fared as a new Sword&Sorcery game, and what path Paizo would have picked then./M</blockquote>